Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Can preclinical drug development help to predict adverse events in clinical trials?
Lap Hing Chi1, Allan D Burrows1, Robin L Anderson2
1Translational Breast Cancer Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
The development of novel therapeutics is associated with high rates of attrition, with unexpected adverse events being a major cause of failure. Serious adverse events have led to organ failure, cancer development and deaths that were not expected outcomes in clinical trials. These life-threatening events were not identified during therapeutic development due to the lack of preclinical safety tests that faithfully represented human physiology. We highlight the successful application of several novel technologies, including high-throughput screening, organs-on-chips, microbiome-containing drug-testing platforms and humanised mouse models, for mechanistic studies and prediction of toxicity. We propose the incorporation of similar preclinical tests into future drug development to reduce the likelihood of hazardous therapeutics entering later-stage clinical trials.
Insights
Novel preclinical safety tests using advanced technologies can predict unexpected adverse events in drug development. Incorporating these methods reduces the risk of hazardous therapeutics reaching clinical trials, improving patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Toxicology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Drug development faces high attrition rates due to unexpected adverse events, leading to severe health outcomes.
- Current preclinical safety tests often fail to accurately represent human physiology, missing critical toxicity signals.
- Life-threatening events like organ failure and cancer have occurred in clinical trials unexpectedly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight novel technologies for improved preclinical safety assessment in drug development.
- To demonstrate the utility of advanced platforms in predicting unforeseen toxicity.
- To advocate for the integration of these technologies to enhance therapeutic safety.
Main Methods:
- Utilized high-throughput screening for early toxicity detection.
- Employed organs-on-chips to model human physiological responses.
- Incorporated microbiome-containing drug-testing platforms for complex interactions.
- Applied humanized mouse models for in vivo safety evaluations.
Main Results:
- Novel technologies successfully enabled mechanistic studies of toxicity.
- These advanced platforms demonstrated predictive capability for adverse events.
- The application of these methods identified potential safety concerns not seen in traditional testing.
Conclusions:
- Advanced preclinical safety testing technologies offer significant improvements over traditional methods.
- Integrating these novel platforms into drug development pipelines can mitigate risks associated with hazardous therapeutics.
- Adoption of these technologies promises to reduce attrition rates and enhance patient safety in clinical trials.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Drug Discovery: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...