Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

09:47
Selective Cleaning of Wild Caenorhabditis Nematodes to Enrich for Intestinal Microbiome Bacteria
Published on: August 13, 2021
3.2K
Selective digestive decontamination, a seemingly effective regimen with individual benefit or a flawed concept with
1Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. jamesh@bhs.org.au.
Critical Care (London, England)
|September 2, 2021
Summary
Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) prevents ICU infections in trials but may cause population harm. Evidence suggests SDD use leads to higher event rates in the ICU setting.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) regimens, combining topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP), are recognized for preventing intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections.
- The effectiveness of SDD has primarily been demonstrated within randomized concurrent control trials (RCCTs), leading to questions about its broader population-level impact.
- The concept of SDD implying a population benefit requires further investigation beyond controlled trial settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reify the concept of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) in humans by analyzing a broad accumulated evidence base.
- To evaluate the population-level effects of SDD, including studies utilizing non-concurrent controls (NCC).
- To determine if SDD use in the ICU context is associated with overall population harm.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive analysis of the accumulated evidence base for SDD was performed.
- Studies involving topical antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) and protocolized parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis (PPAP) with non-concurrent controls (NCC) were included.
- The study treated the accumulated evidence as a natural experiment to assess population-level outcomes.
Main Results:
- The analysis of the broad evidence base, including NCC studies, allowed for the reification of the SDD concept in humans.
- The investigation indicated potential overall population harm associated with SDD use.
- Higher event rates were observed in the ICU context with the utilization of SDD regimens.
Conclusions:
- While SDD regimens show efficacy in preventing ICU-acquired infections within specific trial designs (RCCTs), their broader population impact requires careful consideration.
- The reification of the SDD concept through a natural experiment using accumulated evidence suggests a potential for population-level harm.
- The findings indicate that SDD use in the ICU may be associated with increased event rates, challenging the assumption of universal population benefit.
Related Concept Videos
What is Monogastric Digestion?
73.2K
The human body contains a monogastric digestive system. In a monogastric digestive system, the stomach only contains one chamber in which it digests food. Several other animal species also have monogastric digestive systems, including pigs, horses, dogs, and birds. This chapter, however, focuses on the human digestive system.
73.2K
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
459
Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
459
Enhanced Elimination of Poison
623
Poison can be effectively removed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract through various decontamination procedures.
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...
623
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
970
In cases of acute poisoning, the primary objective is to prevent further absorption of the toxic substance into the body. Immediate interventions using various decontamination techniques targeting the gastrointestinal (GI) tract can achieve this. Decontamination is crucial to prevent poison from entering the systemic circulation, which involves washing affected areas with water and mild soap and removing contaminated clothing. Once external decontamination is done, attention must be turned to...
970
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
6.5K
Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
6.5K

