Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
Published on: January 16, 2018
Deep Learning Approach for Robust Prediction of Reservoir Bubble Point Pressure
Fahd Saeed Alakbari1, Mysara Eissa Mohyaldinn1, Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub1
1Petroleum Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
None:
The bubble point pressure (P b) is a crucial pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) property and a primary input needed for performing many petroleum engineering calculations, such as reservoir simulation. The industrial practice of determining P b is by direct measurement from PVT tests or prediction using empirical correlations. The main problems encountered with the published empirical correlations are their lack of accuracy and the noncomprehensive data set used to develop the model. In addition, most of the published correlations have not proven the relationships between the inputs and outputs as part of the validation process (i.e., no trend analysis was conducted). Nowadays, deep learning techniques such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks have begun to replace the empirical correlations as they generate high accuracy. This study, therefore, presents a robust LSTM-based model for predicting P b using a global data set of 760 collected data points from different fields worldwide to build the model. The developed model was then validated by applying trend analysis to ensure that the model follows the correct relationships between the inputs and outputs and performing statistical analysis after comparing the most published correlations. The robustness and accuracy of the model have been verified by performing various statistical analyses and using additional data that was not part of the data set used to develop the model. The trend analysis results have proven that the proposed LSTM-based model follows the correct relationships, indicating the model's reliability. Furthermore, the statistical analysis results have shown that the lowest average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) is 8.422% and the highest correlation coefficient is 0.99. These values are much better than those given by the most accurate models in the literature.
More Related Videos
08:19Induction of Microstreaming by Nonspherical Bubble Oscillations in an Acoustic Levitation System
Published on: May 9, 2021
10:06Microfluidic Fabrication Techniques for High-Pressure Testing of Microscale Supercritical CO2 Foam Transport in Fractured Unconventional Reservoirs
Published on: July 2, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Excess Pressure Inside a Drop and a Bubble
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
Measurement of Fluid Pressure
A basic form of manometer is the piezometer, a vertical tube open at the top and filled with the same...
Pressure of Fluids
Concept of Pressure at a Point
In a fluid at rest, pressure acts equally in...
Residual Plots
When the residual values are plotted against the variable x, it is called a residual...