Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Liquid-cell Transmission Electron Microscopy for Tracking Self-assembly of Nanoparticles
Published on: October 16, 2017
Body centered tetragonal nanoparticle superlattices: why and when they form?
Leandro Missoni1,2, Mario Tagliazucchi1,2
1Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mario@qi.fcen.uba.ar.
Body centered tetragonal (BCT) nanoparticle superlattices are stabilized by nanoparticle shape, not just substrate interactions. Truncated-octahedron shapes strongly promote BCT structures, offering new control over superlattice formation.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Body centered tetragonal (BCT) phases are intermediate structures between body centered cubic (BCC) and face centered cubic (FCC).
- BCT structures are common in nanoparticle superlattices (NPSLs) but rare in larger colloidal crystals.
- Existing theories for BCT NPSL formation (substrate influence, non-spherical shapes) do not fully explain experimental observations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To independently investigate the roles of substrate influence and nanoparticle shape in stabilizing BCT structures in NPSLs.
- To utilize a molecular theory that accounts for ligand degrees of freedom and solvent effects.
- To elucidate the fundamental mechanisms driving BCT stabilization in nanoparticle assemblies.
Main Methods:
- Application of a recently developed molecular theory for nanoparticle superlattices.
- Explicit consideration of ligand dynamics on nanoparticle surfaces.
- Inclusion of crystallization solvent effects in the theoretical model.
- Independent testing of substrate effects and nanoparticle shape effects on BCT stability.
Main Results:
- Substrate presence can stabilize BCT for spherical nanoparticles, but only under highly specific conditions.
- Non-spherical nanoparticle shapes, specifically truncated octahedrons, robustly stabilize BCT structures across a broad parameter range.
- BCT stabilization by truncated-octahedron shapes arises from geometric factors, independent of differing ligand properties across crystal facets.
Conclusions:
- Nanoparticle shape, particularly truncated-octahedron geometry, is a dominant factor in stabilizing BCT structures in NPSLs.
- Substrate influence plays a more limited role in BCT stabilization compared to nanoparticle geometry.
- These findings provide crucial insights into BCT formation mechanisms and offer guidance for controlling NPSL structures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Valence Bond Theory
Structures of Solids

