Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025
Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
Abnormal femur rotation in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation: A study on upright standing
Cheng Chen1, Lingtian Min2, Minghui Sun3
1Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China; Department of Orthopaedics, Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China.
Background:
The measurements of lower extremity rotational deformities in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in the standing position are available with the application of the EOS imaging system. The aim of our case-control study was to identify the differences on the femur rotation between the supine and standing positions, and to investigate the differences of anatomical and functional femur rotation between RPD patients and controls.
Methods:
Thirty-five lower extremities affected by RPD from 30 patients and 27 intact lower extremities from 27 controls with acute meniscus tear or anterior cruciate ligament injury were recruited. Anatomical femoral anteversion (AFA), functional femoral anteversion (FFA), femorotibial rotation (FTR) and distal femoral torsion (DFT) of all subjects were measured with the EOS imaging system. Computed tomography scans were carried out to analyze the AFA and FFA in the supine position in PRD patients. The differences in FFA between supine and standing position and in AFA, FTR and DFT between RPD and controls were analyzed. The predictor importance of each variable on RPD was observed after cluster analysis.
Results:
The EOS images were available in all subjects. The FFA was significantly smaller in the standing position than in the supine position (P < 0.05) in RPD patients. When comparing with the controls, RPD patients showed higher AFA, FTR and DFT (P < 0.05) but comparable FFA (P < 0.05). The cluster model prompted that FTR and DFT had higher predictor importance than AFA.
Conclusion:
Larger AFA but comparable FFA in patients with RPD than the controls in an upright standing position suggested more internally rotated distal femur in the RPD patients. AFA may be inadequate and FFA should also be considered while planning the treatment for RPD. DFT and FTR should be taken into consideration when evaluating the abnormalities in femur rotation in RPD patients.
