Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response mode and P300 from auditory stimuli.

J Polich1

  • 1Division of Preclinical Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Research Institute of Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037.

Biological Psychology
|August 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

The P300 brainwave is affected by how you respond to sounds. Counting targets produced a stronger and slower P300 response compared to tapping or button presses, especially with eyes closed.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.

Brain and cognition·2001
Same author

P3a from a passive visual stimulus task.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

P300 asymmetry in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

Psychiatry research·2001
Same author

Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b.

Brain topography·2001
Same author

P300 and alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD).

Psychophysiology·2001
Same author

Auditory P3a deficits in male subjects at high risk for alcoholism.

Biological psychiatry·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) provide insights into cognitive processes.
  • The P300 component is a well-studied ERP associated with stimulus evaluation and context updating.
  • Understanding factors influencing P300 characteristics is crucial for interpreting cognitive states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different motor response modes affect the P300 component of event-related brain potentials (ERPs).
  • To examine the influence of eye condition (open vs. closed) on P300 amplitude and latency across response tasks.
  • To determine if the nature of the motor response modulates P300 characteristics during auditory discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • Auditory discrimination task with three distinct response conditions: silent counting, finger tapping, and button pressing.
  • Recording of event-related brain potentials (ERPs), focusing on the P300 component.
  • Experimental manipulation of eye condition (open vs. closed) during task performance.

Main Results:

  • P300 amplitude was significantly larger during the counting task compared to tapping or button press tasks, particularly when subjects' eyes were closed.
  • P300 peak latency was longer in the counting task versus the tapping and button-press tasks under both eye conditions.
  • A significant interaction between response mode and electrode site was observed for P300 peak latency.

Conclusions:

  • The P300 ERP component is sensitive to the type of motor response required during auditory discrimination tasks.
  • Cognitive load or processing demands associated with different response strategies influence P300 characteristics.
  • These findings highlight the importance of considering response modality when interpreting P300 measures in cognitive research.

Related Experiment Videos