Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Murine Echocardiography of Left Atrium, Aorta, and Pulmonary Artery
Published on: February 20, 2017
Validation of the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guideline for Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea and a
Arno A van de Bovenkamp1, Vidya Enait1, Frances S de Man2
1Department of Cardiology Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences (ACS) Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Insights
The 2016 ASE/EACVI echocardiography algorithm shows limited accuracy for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in heart failure patients. Its sensitivity was particularly low, making it unreliable for this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Echocardiography is crucial for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
- Validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) algorithm for diastolic dysfunction assessment in HFpEF is limited.
- Unexplained dyspnea and pulmonary hypertension are common clinical presentations requiring accurate diastolic function evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic performance of the 2016 ASE/EACVI echocardiography algorithm.
- To compare the algorithm's accuracy against invasive measurements (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) and other diagnostic tools (H2FPEF score, NT-proBNP).
- To evaluate the algorithm's utility in patients with unexplained dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 204 patients evaluated for dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension using echocardiography and right heart catheterization.
- Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) served as the gold standard for invasive assessment.
- Diagnostic performance metrics including correlation, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were calculated for the ASE/EACVI algorithm, H2FPEF score, and NT-proBNP.
Main Results:
- The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm demonstrated poor correlation with PCWP for key echocardiographic parameters (indexed left atrial volume, E/e', E, e', tricuspid regurgitation).
- The algorithm's overall accuracy was 67% with low sensitivity (35%) and an area under the curve of 0.56.
- In 30% of cases, the algorithm was indeterminate or not applicable. The H2FPEF score showed better accuracy (73%) than NT-proBNP (57%).
Conclusions:
- The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm has limited diagnostic accuracy for diastolic function in patients with unexplained dyspnea and/or pulmonary hypertension.
- The algorithm's low sensitivity is a significant limitation for detecting diastolic dysfunction.
- Alternative or complementary diagnostic approaches may be necessary for accurate HFpEF diagnosis in this population.
Abstract:
Background Echocardiography is considered the cornerstone of the diagnostic workup of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Thus far, validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) echo-algorithm for evaluation of diastolic (dys)function in a patient suspected of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has been limited. Methods and Results The diagnostic performance of the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm was assessed in 204 patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension with echocardiogram and right heart catheterization. Invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as the gold standard. In addition, the diagnostic performance of H2FPEF score and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) were evaluated. There was a poor correlation between indexed left atrial volume, E/e' (septal and average) or early mitral inflow (E), and PCWP (r=0.25-0.30, P values all <0.01). No correlation was found in our cohort between e' (septal or lateral) or tricuspid valve regurgitation and PCWP. The correlation between diastolic function grades of the ASE/EACVI algorithm and PCWP was poor (r=0.17, P<0.05). The ASE/EACVI algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 87%, respectively; an accuracy of 67% and an area under the curve of 0.56. Moreover, in 30% of cases the algorithm was not applicable or indeterminate. H2FPEF score had a modest correlation with PCWP (r=0.44, P<0.0001), and accuracy was 73%; NT-proBNP correlated weakly with PCWP (r=0.24, P<0.001), and accuracy was 57%. Conclusions The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm for the assessment of diastolic function has a limited diagnostic accuracy in patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea and/or pulmonary hypertension, and especially sensitivity to detect diastolic dysfunction was low.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

