Infarct volume and outcome of cerebral ischaemia, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xianbing Meng1, Jianwen Ji2

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China.

Insights

Infarct volume (IV) significantly predicts poor outcomes in ischemic stroke patients. A meta-analysis found IV is a reliable prognostic criterion, with specific cutoffs aiding outcome prediction.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Numerous studies have explored infarct volume (IV) as a predictor of outcomes in ischemic stroke.
  • However, a systematic review synthesizing these findings was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze studies assessing infarct volume (IV) as a prognostic criterion for patients with cerebral ischemia.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of IV in predicting functional outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane library databases was conducted.
  • Nine studies reporting infarct volume and prognostic outcomes were included.
  • Meta-analysis focused on the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, assessing sensitivity, specificity, and publication bias.

Main Results:

  • A significant association was found between infarct volume (IV) and unfavorable functional outcomes (mRS 3-6) (OR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.74-0.86 per 10 mL).
  • The meta-analysis indicated high heterogeneity among studies (I² = 98.1%).
  • An infarct volume cutoff between 20 and 50 mL demonstrated the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting poor clinical outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Infarct volume (IV) is significantly associated with unfavorable functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.
  • IV serves as a valuable prognostic criterion in managing patients with cerebral ischemia.
Abstract