Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

94.3K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
94.3K
Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

762.0K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
762.0K
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing01:05

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

11.7K
In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local ancestry inference with poorly-matched reference panels.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same author

Molecular mechanism of allosteric modulation of opioid receptors.

Signal transduction and targeted therapy·2026
Same author

Targeted LC-MS/MS validation of unsaturated fatty acid dysregulation and PI3K-Akt-related metabolic signatures in immune thrombocytopenia.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

Predictive Biomarker Graphical Approach (PRIME) for Precision Medicine.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Enabling cross-indication protein expression analysis using a curated pan-cancer dataset and a tailored workflow.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Depth-of-interaction enhanced Compton camera using pixelated LYSO(Ce) scintillator arrays and dual-ended SiPMs.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 21, 2025

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome
06:40

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome

Published on: March 22, 2018

6.0K

Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data.

Brian L Browning1, Xiaowen Tian2, Ying Zhou3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

American Journal of Human Genetics
|September 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Beagle 5.2 offers a fast and memory-efficient method for haplotype phasing, improving scalability for large genetic datasets. This new approach significantly speeds up analysis for whole-genome sequence data compared to existing tools.

Keywords:
TOPMedUK Biobankgenotype phasinghaplotype phasingphasing

More Related Videos

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

7.3K
Next-generation Sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons
10:24

Next-generation Sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons

Published on: August 29, 2014

83.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 21, 2025

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome
06:40

G2-seq: A High Throughput Sequencing-based Technique for Identifying Late Replicating Regions of the Genome

Published on: March 22, 2018

6.0K
Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

7.3K
Next-generation Sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons
10:24

Next-generation Sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene Amplicons

Published on: August 29, 2014

83.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Haplotype phasing is crucial for understanding genetic variation.
  • Existing methods struggle with large-scale SNP array and sequence data.
  • Need for efficient and scalable phasing algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a fast, accurate, and memory-efficient haplotype phasing method.
  • To enable scalable phasing for large SNP array and whole-genome sequence datasets.
  • To improve computational efficiency in genetic data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Marker windowing and composite reference haplotypes for reduced memory and computation.
  • Progressive phasing algorithm for iterative refinement of heterozygote phase.
  • Two-stage algorithm for handling low-frequency variants in sequence data.
  • Implementation in the open-source Beagle 5.2 software.

Main Results:

  • Beagle 5.2 demonstrates comparable accuracy to SHAPEIT 4.2.1 on SNP array data.
  • Beagle 5.2 is over 20 times faster than SHAPEIT 4.2.1 on TOPMed sequence data.
  • Beagle 5.2 achieves similar accuracy to SHAPEIT 4.2.1 on sequence data.
  • Beagle 5.2 scales effectively to larger sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • Beagle 5.2 provides a significant advancement in haplotype phasing efficiency and scalability.
  • The method is particularly advantageous for large-scale whole-genome sequence data analysis.
  • Beagle 5.2 offers a robust and efficient tool for genetic research.