Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Lot variation and inter-device differences contribute to poor analytical performance of the DCA Vantage™ HbA1c POCT
Anders Abildgaard1,2, Cindy Søndersø Knudsen3, Lise Nørkjær Bjerg4
1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark.
Insights
Point-of-care testing (POCT) for glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) using the Siemens DCA Vantage™ shows analytical imprecision and variability due to reagent lots and instruments. This highlights the need for rigorous validation and collaboration in POCT for diabetes management.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Point-of-Care Testing (POCT)
- Diabetes Mellitus Management
Background:
- Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is crucial for diabetes management.
- Siemens DCA Vantage™ offers rapid HbA1c results via POCT.
- Concerns exist regarding the analytical performance of POCT HbA1c methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the analytical performance of the Siemens DCA Vantage™ POCT instrument with established routine methods (Tosoh G8/G11 HPLC).
- To evaluate the impact of reagent lot, instrument, and operator on DCA Vantage™ HbA1c results in a clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 960 routine clinical HbA1c results from the same patient within 48 hours.
- Prospective method comparison with 97 patients in a diabetes out-patient clinic.
- Evaluation of reagent lot, operator, and instrument effects on DCA Vantage™ performance.
Main Results:
- The critical difference (CD) for DCA Vantage™ HbA1c results ranged from 5.14 to 6.61 mmol/mol (0.47-0.55%).
- Analytical imprecision (CVA) of the DCA Vantage™ exceeded 3%.
- Significant effects of reagent lot and inter-instrument variability were observed; operator had no significant effect.
Conclusions:
- The DCA Vantage™ HbA1c assay does not meet current analytical performance specifications.
- Rigorous validation of new reagent lots and instrument recalibration are essential for improving precision.
- Close collaboration between clinicians and laboratory professionals is vital for effective POCT implementation.
- POCT HbA1c results require careful interpretation alongside other glycemic control measures to prevent treatment errors.
Objectives:
The glycated haemoglobin fraction A1c (HbA1c) is widely used in the management of diabetes mellitus, and the Siemens DCA Vantage™ point-of-care testing (POCT) instrument offers rapid HbA1c results even far from a clinical laboratory. However, the analytical performance has been questioned, and not much is known about effects of changing reagent lot, instrument and operator. We therefore compared the analytical performance of the DCA Vantage™ with established routine methods (Tosoh G8/G11 ion exchange HPLC) in a true clinical setting at two Danish hospitals.
Methods:
We extracted all routine clinical HbA1c results incidentally drawn from the same patient within 48 h (n=960 pairs) and evaluated the effect of reagent lot, operator and instrument. We also performed a prospective method comparison in our diabetes out-patient clinic (n=97).
Results:
The critical difference (CD) between two POCT results varied between 5.14 and 6.61 mmol/mol (0.47-0.55%), and the analytical imprecision of the DCA Vantage™ (CVA) was >3%. Significant effect of reagent lot and inter-instrument differences were found, whereas no effect of operator was seen.
Conclusions:
The DCA Vantage™ HbA1c analysis does not fulfil the prevailing analytical performance specifications, but rigorous validation of new reagent lots and continuous recalibration of instruments may potentially improve the precision substantially. Our findings, therefore, clearly emphasise the necessity of a close collaboration between clinicians and laboratory professionals in the POCT field. Finally, POCT HbA1c results should always be interpreted together with other measures of glycaemic control to avoid inappropriate change of patient treatments due to measurement uncertainty.
Related Concept Videos
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Volume of Distribution

