Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Stress Echocardiography After Mitral Valve Repair Using a Semirigid Partial Band
Sachiko Yamazaki1, Kiyoshi Doi2, Satoshi Numata1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Background:
The reduction in exercise capacity after mitral valve repair (MVr) for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation is an unsolved issue. This study aimed to evaluate hemodynamics after MVr using a partial semirigid band during exercise stress echocardiography and to identify predictive factors for achieving better exercise capacity after MVr.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients using exercise stress echocardiography within 5 years of having undergone MVr using a partial semirigid band between 2013 and 2019. Values of maximal workload were converted into numbers of metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved for each patient. Age and sex expected METs (eMETs) were obtained, and percent eMETs (%eMETs [achieved METs / eMETs × 100]) were calculated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify the determinants of %eMETs.
Results:
Only one third of patients achieved eMETs. Significant determinants of %eMETs were age at exercise stress echocardiography (β coefficient 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.96; P < .001), female sex (β coefficient 16.9; 95% confidence interval, 8.58 to 25.17; P < .001), and larger indexed device size (device size/body surface area; β coefficient 4.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 6.46; P = .001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff value of 19.5 mm/m2 or greater indexed device size was optimal for achieving %eMETs greater than 100%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 79%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Patients with larger indexed device size achieved greater exercise capacity after MVr using a partial semirigid band. Preoperative evaluation to decide whether we can use an annuloplasty device larger than 19.5 mm/m2 may be important for patients who intend to exercise with high intensity.
More Related Videos
07:26Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction