Methods and parameters for digital evaluation of gingival recession: A critical review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Marko Kuralt1, Rok Gašperšič2, Aleš Fidler3
1Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Objectives:
The aim of the present review was to find, compare, and critically discuss digital methods for quantitative evaluation of gingival recessions dimensions.
Data:
Collection of articles and classification related to digital evaluation of gingival recessions.
Sources:
A search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and reference lists of articles was conducted up to April 2021.
Study Selection:
Twenty-two articles used digital evaluation of gingival recessions dimensions. The methods in the included articles were extracted, compared, and categorized.
Results:
Digital measurements were performed on 2D intraoral photographs, 3D models, or cross-sections obtained from 3D models. Baseline measurement were performed for diagnostic and treatment planning and categorised into distance and area measurements. Follow-up evaluation of treatment was based either on repeating the "baseline" measurements and calculating differences or measuring differences directly on composite images, composed from two superimposed images obtained at two time-points. Direct measurements were categorised into distance, area, and volume measurements.
Conclusions:
Digital evaluation predominantly means just digitalization of the established evaluation methods; therefore, increasing measurements accuracy and maintaining comparability with past studies. At present, a large variability of digital evaluation workflow among the included studies renders the comparison among different studies difficult if not impossible. The potential of digital evaluation seems not to have been fully exploited as only a few novel measurements and parameters introduced, i.e., volumetric evaluation of soft tissue dynamics. For reproducible and comparable studies in the future, the research should be aimed at evaluation, optimization and standardization of all phases of the digital evaluation.
Clinical Significance:
Digital evaluation, based on 3D image superimposition is a promising approach as it increases measurements accuracy, maintains compatibility with past studies and simultaneously introduces novel evaluation possibilities.
