Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025

A Large Animal Model for Acute Kidney Injury by Temporary Bilateral Renal Artery Occlusion
Published on: February 2, 2021
Timing of AKI after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes: a high-dimensional propensity
Alan S Go1,2,3,4, Thida C Tan5, Rishi V Parikh5
1Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94549, USA. Alan.S.Go@kp.org.
Insights
Acute kidney injury (AKI) after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is linked to worse outcomes. Early AKI (within 12-24 hours) significantly increases the risk of death and worsening kidney function.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- AKI after PCI is associated with increased mortality and progression to chronic kidney disease.
- The prognostic value of AKI timing post-urgent PCI for risk stratification remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between the timing of AKI development after urgent PCI and subsequent risks of adverse outcomes.
- To determine if AKI timing can improve patient risk stratification following urgent PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing urgent PCI between 2008-2013.
- AKI assessed at 12, 24, and 48 hours post-PCI.
- Multivariable Cox models with high-dimensional propensity score adjustment for mortality and worsening kidney function.
Main Results:
- 4.2% of 7250 patients developed AKI.
- AKI at 12 or 24 hours post-PCI was independently associated with significantly higher risks of death and worsening kidney function.
- AKI at 48 hours was associated with increased mortality but not significantly with worsening kidney function.
Conclusions:
- The timing of AKI after urgent PCI may differentially impact the risk of worsening kidney function.
- Early AKI (12-24 hours) poses a greater risk for adverse kidney outcomes compared to later AKI.
- AKI timing may offer a refined approach to risk stratification in patients undergoing urgent PCI.
Introduction:
Acute kidney injury is a common complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and has been associated with an increased risk of death and progressive chronic kidney disease. However, whether the timing of acute kidney injury after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention could be used to improve patient risk stratification is not known.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adults surviving an urgent percutaneous coronary intervention between 2008 and 2013 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated healthcare delivery system, to evaluate the impact of acute kidney injury during hospitalization at 12 (±6), 24 (±6) and 48 (±6) hours after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent risks of adverse outcomes within the first year after discharge. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for a high-dimensional propensity score for developing acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention to examine the associations between acute kidney injury timing and all-cause death and worsening chronic kidney disease.
Results:
Among 7250 eligible adults undergoing urgent percutaneous coronary intervention, 306 (4.2%) had acute kidney injury at one or more of the examined time periods after percutaneous coronary intervention. After adjustment, acute kidney injury at 12 (±6) hours was independently associated with higher risks of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19-5.75) and worsening kidney function (aHR 2.40, 95% CI:1.24-4.63). Similar results were observed for acute kidney injury at 24 (±6) hours and death (aHR 3.90, 95% CI:2.29-6.66) and worsening chronic kidney disease (aHR 4.77, 95% CI:2.46-9.23). Acute kidney injury at 48 (±6) hours was associated with excess mortality (aHR 1.97, 95% CI:1.19-3.26) but was not significantly associated with worsening kidney function (aHR 0.91, 95% CI:0.42-1.98).
Conclusions:
Timing of acute kidney injury after urgent percutaneous coronary intervention may be differentially associated with subsequent risk of worsening kidney function but not death.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

