Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

1.2K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.2K
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

206
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
206
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

400
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
400
Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

515
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
515
PID Controller01:19

PID Controller

290
Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers are widely used in various control systems to enhance stability and performance. In a thermostat, it adjusts heating or cooling based on the temperature difference between the actual and desired levels. They are often used in automotive speed systems, effectively managing sudden speed changes while maintaining a constant speed under varying conditions. On the other hand, PI controllers, commonly employed in voltage regulation, enhance stability...
290
Control Systems01:10

Control Systems

1.5K
Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reinforcement learning in linear embedding space unlocks generalizable control across soft robot configurations.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Steering semi-flexible molecular diffusion model for structure-based drug design with reinforcement learning.

Science advances·2026
Same author

CDIR: LoRA-Inspired Attention for Efficient Composite Degradation Image Restoration.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same author

Design of an automated cell batch microinjection system based on magnetic tweezers for zebrafish embryos.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2026
Same author

Bridging the latency gap with a continuous stream evaluation framework in event-driven perception.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

StarIR: Convolutional Image Restoration With Spatial-Frequency Fusion.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K

Gaussian Process Based Model Predictive Control for Overtaking in Autonomous Driving.

Wenjun Liu1, Chang Liu1, Guang Chen1,2

  • 1Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Frontiers in Neurorobotics
|September 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for autonomous driving, integrating path planning into Gaussian Process-based Model Predictive Control (GPMPC) for safer overtaking and obstacle avoidance. The method enhances vehicle safety and reduces computational load.

Keywords:
Gaussian processautonomous drivingmodel predictive controlovertakingpath planning

More Related Videos

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.1K
Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.6K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.1K
Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • Control Theory
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Autonomous vehicles require robust systems for safe navigation, especially during complex maneuvers like overtaking.
  • Traditional control strategies often struggle with model uncertainties and computational demands.
  • Ensuring vehicle safety under dynamic conditions is a critical challenge in autonomous driving research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel framework for autonomous overtaking and obstacle avoidance.
  • To integrate path planning directly into Gaussian Process-based Model Predictive Control (GPMPC).
  • To enhance safety and reduce computational burden compared to conventional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporating Gaussian Process (GP) regression with a nominal model to learn from uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics.
  • Formulating the geometric relationships between vehicles as constraints within the GPMPC framework.
  • Transforming state constraints into soft constraints using a relaxed barrier function in the cost function for improved optimizer efficiency.

Main Results:

  • The proposed GPMPC framework successfully enables autonomous overtaking maneuvers.
  • Vehicle safety is consistently maintained throughout the simulated scenarios.
  • The approach demonstrates improved performance by learning from model mismatch and unmodeled dynamics.
  • Reduced computational complexity is achieved by eliminating the need for a separate high-level path planner.

Conclusions:

  • The novel GPMPC framework provides an effective solution for safe autonomous overtaking and obstacle avoidance.
  • The integration of GP regression enhances control system robustness and adaptability.
  • This method offers a computationally efficient and safe approach for complex autonomous driving tasks.