Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Labeling Emotion01:20

Labeling Emotion

387
Emotional labeling is a cognitive process that involves identifying and naming one's emotions, such as anger, fear, happiness, or sadness. It allows individuals to recognize and express their internal emotional states, a critical aspect of emotional regulation and communication. Labeling emotions requires more than mere recognition; it also involves drawing upon memory and contextual cues to understand the current situation and apply a corresponding emotional label. For instance, feeling...
387

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the Long-Term Stability of the Spielberger State-Trait Inventory Trait Scale over 3.5 Years.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Expectation violations signal goals in novel human communication.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Memory Boost for Recurring Emotional Events Is Driven by Initial Amygdala Response Promoting Stable Neocortical Patterns across Repetitions.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Stepped, evidence-based and integrated care service model vs. usual care for mental disorders: A randomized controlled trial (RECOVER).

Psychiatry research·2024
Same author

Time-dependent memory transformation in hippocampus and neocortex is semantic in nature.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Mediators of quality of life change in people with severe psychotic disorders treated in integrated care: ACCESS II study.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2022
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.9K

Probing emotional recognition memory: how different response formats affect response behaviour.

Tobias Sommer1, Romy Schröter1, Janine Bayer1

  • 1Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Memory (Hove, England)
|September 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Combining confidence ratings and remember/know (R/K) judgments in memory research can improve accuracy. A two-step approach, with confidence ratings first, offers the benefits of both methods without altering response behavior.

Keywords:
Emotional memorydual process theory of recognition memoryprocess estimates (recollection & familiarity)receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveremember/know

More Related Videos

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.7K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 21, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

16.9K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.7K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Confidence ratings and remember/know (R/K) judgments are standard methods for assessing familiarity and recollection in recognition memory.
  • Each method has unique strengths and weaknesses; combining them may mitigate these limitations.
  • The impact of combined methods on response behavior, especially in emotional memory research, is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how combining confidence ratings and R/K judgments affects response behavior in recognition memory tasks.
  • To determine if combining these methods can offer the advantages of both without introducing response biases.
  • To examine the influence of different response formats on meta-mnemonic processes and emotional memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants provided confidence ratings or R/K judgments in a one-step format as a baseline.
  • Response behavior was compared across one-step R/K judgments, two-step R/K judgments, and two combined formats: confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments, and vice versa.
  • Performance indices, including response criteria and hit/false alarm rates, were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Confidence ratings alone led to more liberal response criteria and higher false alarm rates compared to R/K judgments.
  • Two-step R/K judgments and the combined format of confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments yielded similar response patterns to one-step R/K judgments.
  • Reversing the order (R/K judgments followed by confidence ratings) resulted in more liberal response biases and elevated hit and false alarm rates.
  • Neither recollection nor familiarity contributions were affected by the response format, nor did valence effects vary across formats.

Conclusions:

  • The combined format of confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments appears to integrate the advantages of both methods without negatively impacting response behavior.
  • This combined approach may be particularly useful in emotional memory research by providing a more robust measure of memory components.
  • The findings suggest that the order of combined judgments is crucial for maintaining unbiased response patterns.