Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 21, 2025
Electroacupuncture Combined with Chinese Medicine Ironing Therapy for Functional Constipation
Published on: July 5, 2024
Psychological Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Iranian Randomized Trials
Gholamreza Jandaghi1, Ali Zia-Tohidi1, Manijeh Firoozi2
1Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.
Background:
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common health problem, with considerable effects on the individual's quality of life, mental health, work productivity, and financial aspects. Psychological interventions, which are commonly used as adjunct treatments, have received fairly strong empirical support. In Iran, several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy of these treatments; however, the results of these RCTs have not been synthesized yet. Therefore, in this meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize the results of these trials on the efficacy of psychological interventions in Iranian adults with IBS.
Methods:
We searched IranDoc, ElmNet, PubMed, and Scopus for eligible RCTs. The risk of bias was assessed in each trial, according to the Cochrane guidelines, and the random-effect model was used to pool the effect size (EF) across trials.
Results:
Twenty RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the controls, the standardized mean difference (SMD) for psychological interventions was large regarding the severity of IBS symptoms (-1.21; 95% CI: -1.63 to -0.80), anxiety (-0.97; 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.63), and depression (-0.86; 95% CI: -1.28 to -0.44). There was considerable heterogeneity among the included RCTs regarding all three outcomes, which could not be explained by the available information. On the other hand, the EF of health-related quality of life was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.85), with no significant heterogeneity among RCTs.
Conclusion:
The existing evidence suggests that psychological interventions can be highly effective in improving the severity of IBS symptoms, mental health, and quality of life for Iranian adults with IBS. However, some weaknesses should be considered in the interpretation of the results and future research. The risk of randomization was high or unclear in almost all of the existing trials; there was no single large trial in this area; and there was substantial inconsistency in the EFs, which might be related to methodological or clinical moderators.
More Related Videos
10:37Perturbations of Circulating miRNAs in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Detected Using a Multiplexed High-throughput Gene Expression Platform
Published on: November 30, 2016
07:15An In Vitro Batch-culture Model to Estimate the Effects of Interventional Regimens on Human Fecal Microbiota
Published on: July 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management
01:17Irritable Bowel Syndrome I: Introduction
IBS is a chronic condition that can persist over a long period or recur frequently.
The pathogenesis of IBS involves a complex interplay of the following factors:
Altered...
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
01:30Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
01:17Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
01:21Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS