R.E.S.P.e.c.T and intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study using DHS data in Kenya
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA calward@umich.edu.
BMJ Open
|September 8, 2021
Summary
The WHO
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Women's Health
- Social Epidemiology
Background:
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects 30% of women globally.
- The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the R.E.S.P.E.C.T. framework to address IPV.
- Understanding the efficacy of the R.E.S.P.E.C.T. framework in diverse settings is crucial for IPV prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the association between the WHO's R.E.S.P.E.C.T. framework and intimate partner violence (IPV) among women in Kenya.
- To assess the impact of specific R.E.S.P.E.C.T. strategies on reducing the likelihood of experiencing IPV.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the 2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS), focusing on women in married or cohabiting relationships (n=3737).
- Developed a summary score for R.E.S.P.E.C.T. strategies based on KDHS questions and assessed reliability using Cronbach's alpha.
- Employed multiple logistic regression models to analyze the relationship between R.E.S.P.E.C.T. scores and the prevalence of IPV.
Main Results:
- All R.E.S.P.E.C.T. strategies, except for land and property ownership (E), were associated with lower odds of IPV.
- Decision-making (R), access to healthcare (S), wealth (P), and not justifying wife-beating (T) significantly reduced IPV risk.
- A higher total R.E.S.P.E.C.T. score was strongly associated with decreased odds of experiencing IPV, even after adjusting for demographics.
Conclusions:
- The R.E.S.P.E.C.T. framework demonstrates potential for significantly reducing intimate partner violence against women.
- A comprehensive, multi-strategy approach is essential for effective IPV prevention.
- Demographic Health Surveys (DHS) can serve as valuable tools for monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of the R.E.S.P.E.C.T. framework.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
12.0K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
828
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
828
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
628
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
628
Study Designs in Epidemiology
516
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
516
Observational Studies
10.1K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
10.1K
Relationship Formation
42.4K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
42.4K


