Related Experiment Videos
Should yeasts in respiratory secretions be identified?
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
|January 1, 1977
Summary
Microscopic oropharyngeal contamination in sputum reliably predicts yeast presence. Routine identification of most yeasts in respiratory secretions is unnecessary, as they represent normal flora, except for Cryptococcus neoformans.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Respiratory secretions are routinely cultured to diagnose pulmonary infections.
- Oropharyngeal contamination of sputum samples is a common issue in diagnostics.
- Understanding the microbial flora of the respiratory tract is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of microscopic oropharyngeal contamination as an indicator for yeast presence in respiratory samples.
- To determine the clinical significance of yeast detection in sputum and bronchial washings.
Main Methods:
- Microscopic examination of 440 sputum and bronchial washing samples for oropharyngeal secretions.
- Culture analysis of the same specimens to identify yeast species.
- Correlation of microscopic contamination with culture results.
Main Results:
- 88% of sputum samples showed oropharyngeal contamination, compared to 21% of bronchial washings.
- Yeasts were recovered from 74% of sputum and 25% of bronchial washings.
- Microscopic contamination was a reliable predictor of yeast presence in respiratory secretions.
Conclusions:
- Microscopic assessment of oropharyngeal contamination is a valuable tool for predicting yeast in respiratory samples.
- Most yeasts found in respiratory secretions are likely normal flora, not indicative of infection.
- Routine identification of common yeasts is not recommended, with the exception of Cryptococcus neoformans.