STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic rather than predictive?

Alessandro Di Federico1, Andrea De Giglio1, Claudia Parisi1

  • 1Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
|September 9, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Mutations in STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 genes are linked to poor outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These mutations may have a prognostic rather than predictive role in NSCLC treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Immunotherapy

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable alterations.
  • Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is an imperfect biomarker for ICI response.
  • Novel biomarkers are crucial as most patients do not benefit from immunotherapy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the literature on the role of STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC.
  • To clarify the prognostic and predictive value of these mutations in advanced NSCLC.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of studies on STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC.
  • Analysis of outcomes in patients treated with ICIs, chemotherapy, and other therapies.
  • Evaluation of mutation impact in relation to KRAS status and co-occurring mutations.

Main Results:

  • STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations are common in advanced NSCLC (25-30% and 11-27%, respectively).
  • These mutations correlate with poor outcomes with ICI, especially with concurrent KRAS mutations.
  • Studies suggest STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations have a prognostic, not predictive, value, showing similar effects across different treatments.

Conclusions:

  • STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations are associated with poor outcomes in NSCLC, particularly when co-occurring with KRAS mutations.
  • The prognostic value of these mutations appears consistent across different treatment modalities.
  • Further research is needed to address limitations like combined mutation analysis and lack of diverse treatment comparison arms.