Perceptual strain in a compensable hot environment: Accuracy and clinical correlates

Heat strain monitoring indexes are important to prevent exertional heat illness (EHI) and uncover risk factors. Two indexes are the Physiological Strain Index (PSI) and a subjective PSI analogue, the Perceptual Strain Index (PeSI). The PeSI is a feasible alternative to PSI in field conditions, although the validity has been variable in previous research. However, the PeSI has been rarely examined at a low heat strain with compensable heat stress, such as during a heat tolerance test (HTT). This study evaluated the discrepancy between the maximal PeSI and maximal PSI achieved during a HTT and determined their association with EHI risk factors, including history of EHI, percent body fat (%BF), relative VO_2max, fatigue and sleep status (n = 121; 47 without prior EHI, 74 with prior EHI). The PSI was calculated using the change in rectal temperature (T_re) and heart rate (HR) and PeSI was calculated based on the formula containing thermal sensation (TS), a T_re analogue, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE), a HR analogue. Significant associations were identified between PSI and PeSI and between PSI_HR and PeSI_HR in the total sample and between PSI and PeSI in the EHI group. Bland-Altman analyses indicated PeSI underestimated PSI in the total sample, PSI_HR was greater than PeSI_HR, and that PSI_core and PeSI_core were not significantly different, but values varied widely at different heat strains. This indicates the use of RPE underestimates HR and that the accuracy of TS to predict T_re may be subpar. This study also demonstrated that participants with higher %BF have a decreased perception of heat strain and that post-fatigue, sleep status and a prior EHI may increase the perception of heat strain. Overall, these results suggest that PeSI is a poor surrogate for PSI in a compensable heat stress environment at low heat strain.