Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Identifying the Binding Proteins of Small Ligands with the Differential Radial Capillary Action of Ligand Assay DRaCALA
Published on: March 19, 2021
How Different Albumin-Binders Drive Probe Distribution of Fluorescent RGD Mimetics
Carsten Höltke1, Wael Alsibai1, Martin Grewer1
1Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Abstract:
The biodistribution of medical imaging probes depends on the chemical nature of the probe and the preferred metabolization and excretion routes. Especially targeted probes, which have to reach a certain (sub)cellular destination, have to be guided to the tissue of interest. Therefore, small molecular probes need to exhibit a well-balanced polarity and lipophilicity to maintain an advantageous bioavailability. Labelled antibodies circulate for several days due to their size. To alter the biodistribution behavior of probes, different strategies have been pursued, including utilizing serum albumin as an inherent transport mechanism for small molecules. We describe here the modification of an existing fluorescent RGD mimetic probe targeted to integrin αvβ3 with three different albumin binding moieties (ABMs): a diphenylcyclohexyl (DPCH) group, a p-iodophenyl butyric acid (IPBA) and a fatty acid (FA) group with the purpose to identify an optimal ABM for molecular imaging applications. All three modifications result in transient albumin binding and a preservation of the target binding capability. Spectrophotometric measurements applying variable amounts of bovine serum albumin (BSA) reveal considerable differences between the compounds concerning their absorption and emission characteristics and hence their BSA binding mode. In vivo the modified probes were investigated in a murine U87MG glioblastoma xenograft model over the course of 1 wk by fluorescence reflectance imaging (FRI) and fluorescence mediated tomography (FMT). While the unmodified probe was excreted rapidly, the albumin-binding probes were accumulating in tumor tissue for at least 5 days. Considerable differences between the three probes in biodistribution and excretion characteristics were proved, with the DPCH-modified probe showing the highest overall signal intensities, while the FA-modified probe exhibits a low but more specific fluorescent signal. In conclusion, the modification of small molecular RGD mimetics with ABMs can precisely fine-tune probe distribution and offers potential for future clinical applications.
More Related Videos
16:16Genetically-encoded Molecular Probes to Study G Protein-coupled Receptors
Published on: September 13, 2013
14:02Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
Published on: April 9, 2018