Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
Evaluation of performance of pelvic CT-MR deformable image registration using two software programs
Tomoya Ishida1, Noriyuki Kadoya1, Shunpei Tanabe1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai 980-8574, Japan.
Deformable image registration (DIR) accuracy between CT and MR images was assessed using open-source and commercial software. Results showed DIR accuracy varied by imaging sequence, particularly for the bladder, impacting clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
- Image Processing
Background:
- Deformable image registration (DIR) is crucial for aligning medical images.
- Assessing DIR accuracy between CT and MR images is essential for treatment planning.
- Evaluating open-source and commercial DIR software provides insights into their performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of deformable image registration (DIR) between CT and MR images using Elastix and Velocity AI.
- To evaluate the impact of different DIR parameter settings and MR sequences on registration accuracy.
- To determine the suitability of these DIR methods for clinical applications involving pelvic anatomy.
Main Methods:
- CT, T1-weighted (T1w) MR, and T2-weighted (T2w) MR images from five male patients' pelvic regions were used.
- Deformable image registration (DIR) was performed using open-source Elastix software with varying regularization weights and commercial Velocity AI software.
- Accuracy was evaluated using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Mean Distance to Agreement (MDA) for prostate, bladder, rectum, and femoral heads.
Main Results:
- Most DIR algorithms achieved good accuracy (DSC and MDA) for pelvic organs, except for the bladder.
- Elastix showed CT-T1w outperformed CT-T2w for DSC and MDA at lower regularization weights (0, 0.01, 0.1).
- Velocity AI demonstrated no significant differences in DSC and MDA across organs, suggesting sequence-dependent DIR accuracy.
Conclusions:
- DIR accuracy between CT and MR images can vary depending on the MR sequence used.
- Open-source (Elastix) and commercial (Velocity AI) software show different sensitivities to DIR parameters and image sequences.
- Further research is needed to optimize DIR protocols for specific clinical applications and imaging modalities.
More Related Videos
07:13Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
16:01An Experimental Protocol for Assessing the Performance of New Ultrasound Probes Based on CMUT Technology in Application to Brain Imaging
Published on: September 24, 2017