Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025
09:06
Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
8.3K
Microdynamic Study of Spin-Lattice Coupling Effects on Skyrmion Transport
Yifeng Wu1,2, Haohua Wen1,2,3, Weijin Chen1,2,4
1Centre for Physical Mechanics and Biophysics, School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Physical Review Letters
|September 10, 2021
Summary
A novel migration barrier for skyrmion transport, driven by lattice distortions, was identified. This finding offers new insights into skyrmion dynamics in spintronic devices, distinct from defect pinning effects.
Area of Science:
- Spintronics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Materials Science
Background:
- Skyrmion transport is crucial for spintronic device performance, influencing speed and energy efficiency.
- Existing research attributes skyrmion migration barriers to pinning effects from crystalline defects.
- Understanding these barriers is key to optimizing skyrmion-based technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate an alternative mechanism for skyrmion migration barriers.
- To explore the role of spin-lattice coupling and local lattice distortions.
- To provide a refreshed mechanistic understanding of skyrmion transport.
Main Methods:
- Spin-lattice dynamics simulations were employed.
- The influence of local lattice distortion fields was analyzed.
- Microdynamic insights into skyrmion behavior were obtained.
Main Results:
- A local lattice distortion field, arising from spin-lattice coupling, can induce a migration barrier for skyrmions.
- This mechanism replicates the observed Arrhenius diffusion behavior in materials without crystalline defects.
- The simulations provide detailed microdynamic understanding of this phenomenon.
Conclusions:
- Local lattice distortion is a significant, previously underappreciated, source of skyrmion migration barriers.
- This discovery offers a new perspective on skyrmion transport, independent of material defects.
- The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of skyrmion dynamics for spintronic applications.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.1K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.1K
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.1K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.1K
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.2K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.2K
02:54Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
25.2K
An ionic compound is stable because of the electrostatic attraction between its positive and negative ions. The lattice energy of a compound is a measure of the strength of this attraction. The lattice energy (ΔHlattice) of an ionic compound is defined as the energy required to separate one mole of the solid into its component gaseous ions. For the ionic solid sodium chloride, the lattice energy is the enthalpy change of the process:
25.2K
01:08NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
2.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.0K
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.2K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.2K