Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Establishing Intracranial Brain Tumor Xenografts With Subsequent Analysis of Tumor Growth and Response to Therapy using Bioluminescence Imaging
Published on: July 13, 2010
Four-year patient-level pooled mortality analysis of the ILLUMENATE US Pivotal and EU randomized controlled trials
Sean P Lyden1, Marianne Brodmann2, Sahil A Parikh3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Insights
Long-term safety of Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for peripheral artery disease shows no significant difference in 4-year all-cause mortality. This confirms the Stellarex DCB
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects millions globally, necessitating effective treatment options.
- Drug-coated balloons (DCB) offer a less invasive approach compared to traditional methods.
- Long-term safety data for DCB devices like Stellarex are crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the 4-year safety profile of the Stellarex DCB compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
- To conduct a meta-analysis of patient-level data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- To assess all-cause mortality as a primary safety endpoint.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of patient-level data from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs.
- Kaplan-Meier methodology for estimating all-cause mortality rates.
- Cox proportional hazard modeling to identify mortality predictors.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 4-year all-cause mortality between Stellarex DCB (14.0%) and PTA (14.4%) groups (P=.864).
- Independent adjudication confirmed no significant differences in deaths between cohorts.
- Predictors of mortality included age, renal insufficiency, and lesion length, not paclitaxel exposure or dose.
Conclusions:
- The Stellarex DCB demonstrates an acceptable long-term safety profile.
- No increased mortality risk was observed with Stellarex DCB compared to PTA up to 4 years.
- Findings support the use of Stellarex DCB in femoropopliteal disease treatment.
Objective:
To perform a meta-analysis of two concordant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the long-term, 4-year safety profile of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) vs percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of peripheral artery disease.
Methods:
An independent, third-party, meta-analysis of homogeneous, patient-level data from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs was performed to assess mortality (time to death) in patients treated for symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate hazard rates [HRs] of all-cause mortality, and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess predictors of mortality. All serious adverse events, including deaths, were adjudicated by an independent, blinded clinical events committee.
Results:
In total, 589 (419 DCB; 170 PTA) patients were included in the pooled analysis of the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs. The median follow-up was 1735 days (interquartile range, 1434-1829 days), equivalent to 4.75 years. Vital status compliance was >95% in each RCT. The total number of deaths through 4 years was 81 of 589 (13.8%): 58 of 419 (13.8%) in the DCB arm and 23 of 170 (13.5%) in the PTA arm. The 1-year KM estimate of all-cause mortality was 1.9% ± 0.7% (estimate ±standard error) in those treated with DCB vs 1.2% ± 0.9% in those treated with PTA. At 2, 3, and 4 years, the respective KM estimates were 6.6% ± 1.2% vs 4.9% ± 1.7%, 9.3% ± 1.4% vs 9.9% ± 2.4%, and 14.0% ± 1.7% vs 14.4% ± 2.8% (P = .864). There were no significant differences in clinical events committee-adjudicated deaths between the two cohorts. In multivariate analysis, predictors of 4-year mortality were age (HR, 1.048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.026-1.071; P < .0001), renal insufficiency (HR, 2.440; 95% CI, 1.566-3.800; P < .0001), and lesion length (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000-1.008; P = .041). Neither paclitaxel exposure (DCB vs PTA; HR, 1.086; 95% CI, 0.709-1.664; P = .705) nor dose (mg; HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.971-1.119; P = .248) was the predictor of all-cause mortality at 4 years.
Conclusions:
This systematic meta-analysis of two concordant ILLUMENATE RCTs shows no difference in all-cause mortality through 4 years between Stellarex DCB and PTA, confirming the acceptable, long-term safety profile of the Stellarex DCB.
More Related Videos
13:17In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Photocontrolled Biologically Active Compounds - Potential Drug Candidates for Cancer Photopharmacology
Published on: September 29, 2023
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...