Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025
Modeling Ascending Vaginal Infection, Preterm Birth, and Neonatal Morbidity in Mice
Published on: October 10, 2025
Revisions to mid-pregnancy cervical length reference range for preterm birth screening among singleton pregnancies in
Ksenia Olisova1, Chan-Yu Sung1, Eric C Lussier1
1Department of Research & Development, Taiji Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan.
Objective:
Our study aimed to build a normal reference range for routine mid-pregnancy cervical length screening for preterm birth (PTB) based on a large cross-section of Taiwanese singleton pregnancies. Based on our reference range findings, we aim to develop a Z-score and centile calculator.
Materials And Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of the routine mid-trimester cervical length measurement in low-risk singleton pregnancies (without known abnormal growth or karyotype, congenital malformation, history of preterm birth due to preterm premature rupture of the membranes, or history of cervical cerclage treatment). From November 2008 to June 2018, the cervical lengths of 51,644 Taiwanese low-risk pregnant women were measured by experienced sonographers via transvaginal ultrasound during second trimester fetal anatomical screening at 20-24 weeks of gestation. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the distribution. Cole's lambda, mu, sigma (LMS) method was applied to build mid-pregnancy cervical length reference range and calculate Z-scores. Cut-off values of 2.5, 2.0 and 1.5 cm were used to evaluate the number of pregnancies considered high-risk for PTB.
Results:
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the cervical length measurements did not follow a normal distribution (<0.001). Reference range constructed by LMS method was presented in our study. Mean cervical length was 3.82 cm (SD = 0.62 cm). Overall, less than 0.3% of women had a cervical length shorter than 1.5 cm.
Conclusion:
We are providing an open access calculator for z-score and centile calculation for use in clinical practice for assessing how CL measurement compares in normally developing singleton pregnancies. Further investigation is needed to determine if Z-scores can better assess risk for PTB compared to fixed cut-offs. Since Z-scores are used to assess large deviations from normal development, they may be a useful tool for risk assessment and can be the basis for future standardized screening protocol in Taiwan.
