Mortality and significant neurosensory impairment in preterm infants: an international comparison

Marie Chevallier1,2, Thierry Debillon3,2, Brian A Darlow4

  • 1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Grenoble Alps University Hospital Centre Couples and Children Section, Grenoble, France MChevallier3@chu-grenoble.fr.

Insights

Outcomes for extremely preterm infants varied significantly across three high-income countries, with higher mortality observed in the French cohort (EPIPAGE-2) compared to Australian/New Zealand (ANZNN) and Canadian (CNN/CNFUN) cohorts. These differences highlight potential impacts of varying perinatal practices on infant survival and neurodevelopmental impairment.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Perinatal Epidemiology
  • Developmental Pediatrics

Background:

  • Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks' gestation) face significant risks of mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment.
  • International comparisons are crucial for understanding variations in care and outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare mortality and significant neurosensory impairment (sNSI) rates at 18-36 months corrected age.
  • To analyze outcomes in extremely preterm infants across three distinct international cohorts.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from three population-based cohorts: ANZNN, CNN/CNFUN, and EPIPAGE-2.
  • Inclusion criteria: extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks' gestation) born in 2011.
  • Primary outcome: composite of mortality or sNSI (cerebral palsy, hearing loss, blindness).

Main Results:

  • 3055 infants were included. Composite outcome rates were 21.3% (ANZNN), 20.6% (CNN/CNFUN), and 28.4% (EPIPAGE-2).
  • Mortality rates were 18.7% (ANZNN), 17.4% (CNN/CNFUN), and 26.3% (EPIPAGE-2).
  • EPIPAGE-2 showed significantly higher odds of the composite outcome compared to ANZNN and CNN/CNFUN, primarily driven by higher mortality.

Conclusions:

  • Significant differences in mortality and sNSI outcomes exist for extremely preterm infants across high-income countries.
  • Variations in perinatal approaches and practices may explain these outcome disparities.
  • Further research into best practices is warranted to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos