Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Masking by uniform field flicker: some practical problems.

D R Badcock1, E Sevdalis

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Perception
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Syncope in an adolescent: a case of conflicting tests and dual pathology.

International journal of clinical practice·2009
Same author

Foveal contrast processing of increment and decrement targets is equivalently reduced in glaucoma.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
Same author

Prevalence of exercise-induced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2007
Same author

Motion perception in migraineurs: abnormalities are not related to attention.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2006
Same author

Do migraineurs have difficulty judging direction of simulated heading?

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2006
Same author

Motion processing deficits in migraine.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache·2004
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Uniform Field Flicker (UFF) masking, when corrected for a luminance artifact, showed weaker effects on contrast sensitivity. This challenges previous interpretations of UFF masking for studying visual system channels.

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Human visual system research
  • Perceptual psychology

Background:

  • Uniform Field Flicker (UFF) masking is a technique used to study neural channels in the human visual system.
  • Previous implementations of UFF masking contained an artifact where target contrast flickered with mean luminance.
  • This artifact potentially confounded results regarding sustained and transient neural channels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correct the artifact in Uniform Field Flicker (UFF) masking implementation.
  • To re-examine the effects of corrected UFF masking on the contrast sensitivity function.
  • To reassess the validity of using UFF masking to differentiate between transient and sustained visual channels.

Main Methods:

  • Corrected the artifactual synchrony between target contrast and mean luminance flicker in UFF masking.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined the impact of the corrected UFF masking on the contrast sensitivity function.
  • Analyzed the spatial frequency dependence of the masking effect.

    • Main Results:

    • Corrected UFF masking still primarily affected contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies.
    • The magnitude of the masking effect was significantly weaker than previously reported.
    • The findings suggest a limited role for UFF masking in isolating transient and sustained channels.

    Conclusions:

    • The artifact correction weakens the original claims about UFF masking's utility.
    • The evidence for UFF masking as a tool to distinguish transient and sustained channels is less robust than previously thought.
    • Further research may be needed to clarify the specific contributions of different visual channels.