Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Behavioural Pharmacology in Classical Conditioning of the Proboscis Extension Response in Honeybees Apis mellifera
Published on: January 24, 2011
Heritable Cognitive Phenotypes Influence Appetitive Learning but not Extinction in Honey Bees.
Eda Sezen1, Emily Dereszkiewicz1, Alvin Hozan1
1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Honey bees with high latent inhibition (LI) learned better with dual reinforcement. However, all LI genotypes showed similar learning acquisition and extinction rates, impacting foraging decisions.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Cognitive science
- Insect neurobiology
Background:
- Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) learn environmental cues during foraging.
- Individual bees exhibit variation in learning, including differences in latent inhibition (LI).
- Latent inhibition (LI) is a learning process where prior exposure to a stimulus without reward reduces later conditioning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if distinct LI genotypes in honey bees learn differently based on reinforcement pathways (antennae vs. antennae + proboscis).
- To determine if learned information extinction rates differ between high and low LI honey bee genotypes.
- To understand how cognitive differences influence honey bee learning and foraging decisions.
Main Methods:
- Comparing learning performance in distinct LI genotypes of honey bees under different reinforcement conditions.
- Assessing the acquisition and extinction rates of learned information in selected LI lines.
- Utilizing antennae-only versus antennae + proboscis reinforcement to evaluate learning pathways.
Main Results:
- High LI bees demonstrated significantly better learning when reinforced via both antennae and proboscis.
- Low LI and control bees showed similar learning performance with both reinforcement pathways.
- No significant differences were observed in the acquisition and extinction of learned information between high and low LI bees.
Conclusions:
- Honey bee LI genotypes influence learning efficacy based on reinforcement type.
- Cognitive variations, specifically LI, may shape individual and colony-level foraging strategies.
- Understanding LI provides insight into how honey bees learn and value information in complex environments.
More Related Videos
10:31A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research
Published on: September 8, 2014
10:14Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.
Published on: December 12, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Instinctive Drift
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Inclusive Fitness
Frequency-dependent Selection
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...