Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025
The Rabbit Blood-shunt Model for the Study of Acute and Late Sequelae of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Technical Aspects
Published on: October 2, 2014
Comparative study of subdural drain (SDD) versus sub periosteal drain (SPD) in treating patient with chronic subdural
Kolakoth Pathoumthong1, Chumpon Jetjumnong1
1Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Background:
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is common neurosurgical condition encountered in daily practice. Burr holes evacuation is standard treatment for symptomatic cases. Both subdural drain (SDD) and subperiosteal drain (SPD) have been reported to lower the recurrence rate when used in conjunction with burr holes. A randomized controlled trials were done to see if there were any differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between the two types of drains.
Methods:
A total of 42 CSDH patients were enrolled and allocated to one of two groups: SDD (n = 21) or SPD (n = 21). Demographic data, perioperative imaging characteristics, clinical outcome, and recurrence rate were recorded for comparison.
Results:
In both groups, demographic characteristics such as sex ratio, mean age of patients, concomitant disease, and antithrombotic agent use were similar. At 6 months, 20 (95.2%) and 21 (100%) cases in the SDD and SPD groups, respectively, had a favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Complete hematoma resolution at 6 months was achieved in 21 (100%) and 19 (90.5%) cases of the SDD and SPD groups, respectively. The amount of drain within 48 h was not difference between the two groups. None of the SDD recurred, but two of the SPD group did, necessitating reoperation, which had no effect on the final outcome.
Conclusion:
These findings indicate that the drain type (SDD or SPD) has no effect on the outcome. The surgeon's preference determines which procedure is used. Except in symptomatic circumstances, routine postoperative imaging may not be required.
