Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

10.4K
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...
10.4K
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy01:16

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

17.6K
Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...
17.6K
Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:28

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

459
Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...
459

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DDLVis: Real-time Visual Query of Spatiotemporal Data Distribution via Density Dictionary Learning.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2021
Same author

Silicone gel sheeting for treating hypertrophic scars.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2021
Same author

DAB2IP decreases cell growth and migration and increases sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs in colorectal cancer.

Annals of translational medicine·2021
Same author

Programmable dual responsive system reconstructing nerve interaction with small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts and inhibiting intimal hyperplasia in diabetes.

Bioactive materials·2021
Same author

ProtRe-CN: Protein Remote Homology Detection by Combining Classification Methods and Network Methods via Learning to Rank.

IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2021
Same author

Pain relief and cartilage repair by Nanofat against osteoarthritis: preclinical and clinical evidence.

Stem cell research & therapy·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip
11:23

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip

Published on: August 17, 2011

17.8K

Parametric comparison between sparsity-based and deep learning-based image reconstruction of super-resolution

Junjie Chen1,2,3, Yun Chen1,2,3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Biomedical Optics Express
|September 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Deep learning (VDSR) and sparsity-based (SPIDER) algorithms reconstruct super-resolution microscopy images faster. VDSR offers better localization accuracy, while SPIDER excels at identifying true zero pixels, aiding emitter count evaluation.

More Related Videos

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells
07:55

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Published on: November 5, 2017

7.4K
Imaging Intermediate Filaments and Microtubules with 2-dimensional Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy
14:23

Imaging Intermediate Filaments and Microtubules with 2-dimensional Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy

Published on: March 6, 2018

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip
11:23

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip

Published on: August 17, 2011

17.8K
Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells
07:55

Ground State Depletion Super-resolution Imaging in Mammalian Cells

Published on: November 5, 2017

7.4K
Imaging Intermediate Filaments and Microtubules with 2-dimensional Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy
14:23

Imaging Intermediate Filaments and Microtubules with 2-dimensional Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy

Published on: March 6, 2018

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Microscopy and imaging science
  • Computational imaging
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Localization-based super-resolution microscopy (LSM) faces challenges with imaging speed and emitter density.
  • Sparsity-based and deep learning-based algorithms offer potential solutions for accelerating LSM image acquisition.
  • A comprehensive comparison of these reconstruction algorithms is lacking for practical guidance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of sparsity-based and deep learning-based algorithms for super-resolution image reconstruction.
  • To guide the practical application of these algorithms in localization-based super-resolution microscopy.
  • To assess algorithm performance under varying sparsity and connectivity conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated fluorescent microscopy images were synthesized with controlled sparsity and connectivity.
  • Performance evaluation of deep learning-based VDSR and sparsity-based SPIDER algorithms on simulated data.
  • Validation of findings using experimentally acquired super-resolution microscopy images.

Main Results:

  • The deep learning-based VDSR algorithm demonstrated faster image recovery, higher recall rates, and improved localization accuracy.
  • The sparsity-based SPIDER algorithm showed superior performance in truthfully recovering zero pixels, indicating better identification of non-emitter regions.
  • Results from simulated data were consistent with those obtained from real experimental data.

Conclusions:

  • VDSR is recommended for applications prioritizing precise emitter localization in super-resolution microscopy.
  • SPIDER is more suitable for scenarios where accurate quantification of the number of emitters is critical.
  • Both algorithms show promise for accelerating super-resolution image acquisition, with distinct strengths for different applications.