Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Time-Lapse Epifluorescence Microscopy Imaging of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Heterogeneous Phenotypes
Published on: February 14, 2025
Single-Cell Imaging Reveals That Staphylococcus aureus Is Highly Competitive Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa on
Selina Niggli1, Tobias Wechsler1, Rolf Kümmerli1
1Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus frequently occur together in polymicrobial infections, and their interactions can complicate disease progression and treatment options. While interactions between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus have been extensively described using planktonic batch cultures, little is known about whether and how individual cells interact with each other on solid substrates. This is important because both species frequently colonize surfaces to form aggregates and biofilms in infections. Here, we performed single-cell time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, combined with automated image analysis, to describe interactions between P. aeruginosa PAO1 with three different S. aureus strains (Cowan I, 6850, JE2) during microcolony growth on agarose surfaces. While P. aeruginosa is usually considered the dominant species, we found that the competitive balance tips in favor of S. aureus on surfaces. We observed that all S. aureus strains accelerated the onset of microcolony growth in competition with P. aeruginosa and significantly compromised P. aeruginosa growth prior to physical contact. Upon direct contact, JE2 was the most competitive S. aureus strain, simply usurping P. aeruginosa microcolonies, while 6850 was the weakest competitor itself suppressed by P. aeruginosa. Moreover, P. aeruginosa reacted to the assault of S. aureus by showing increased directional growth and expedited expression of quorum sensing regulators controlling the synthesis of competitive traits. Altogether, our results reveal that quantitative single-cell live imaging has the potential to uncover microbial behaviors that cannot be predicted from batch culture studies, and thereby contribute to our understanding of interactions between pathogens that co-colonize host-associated surfaces during polymicrobial infections.
Insights
Interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus on surfaces favor S. aureus, impacting polymicrobial infections. Single-cell imaging reveals competitive dynamics and bacterial responses.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbial Ecology
Background:
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are common in polymicrobial infections.
- Interactions are well-studied in liquid cultures but poorly understood on solid surfaces.
- Both bacteria form aggregates and biofilms on surfaces during infection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate single-cell interactions between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus on solid surfaces.
- To compare the competitive dynamics of different S. aureus strains against P. aeruginosa.
- To understand how these bacteria respond to each other during microcolony formation.
Main Methods:
- Single-cell time-lapse fluorescence microscopy.
- Automated image analysis.
- Microcolony growth on agarose surfaces with P. aeruginosa PAO1 and three S. aureus strains (Cowan I, 6850, JE2).
Main Results:
- S. aureus outcompeted P. aeruginosa on surfaces, contrary to liquid culture observations.
- All S. aureus strains accelerated microcolony initiation and inhibited P. aeruginosa growth before contact.
- Strain JE2 aggressively took over P. aeruginosa microcolonies, while strain 6850 was suppressed by P. aeruginosa.
- P. aeruginosa exhibited increased directional growth and faster quorum sensing regulator expression in response to S. aureus.
Conclusions:
- Surface interactions between P. aeruginosa and S. aureus differ significantly from liquid culture dynamics.
- S. aureus can dominate P. aeruginosa on surfaces, influencing polymicrobial infection outcomes.
- Single-cell imaging is crucial for uncovering unpredicted microbial behaviors in co-colonization.

