Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Hyperoncotic Albumin Solution in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Patients.
Zachary O'Brien1,2,3, Mark Finnis4,5,6, Martin Gallagher7
1Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, zach.obrien01@gmail.com.
Hyperoncotic (20%) human albumin solution (HAS) in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) was linked to negative fluid balance but not increased mortality or RRT dependence compared to 4% HAS.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a critical intervention for critically ill patients.
- Human albumin solution (HAS) is frequently administered in intensive care units.
- The use of varying concentrations of HAS, particularly hyperoncotic 20% HAS, requires careful evaluation in RRT patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association of hyperoncotic (20%) human albumin solution (HAS) with patient outcomes.
- To compare outcomes in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) treated with 20% HAS versus 4% HAS.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level (RENAL) RRT trial.
- Comparison of patient outcomes, including mortality and RRT independence, based on HAS administration (4% only, 20% only, or both).
- Utilized Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the impact of 20% HAS exposure on mortality and RRT recovery.
Main Results:
- Of 1,508 patients, 771 received albumin, with varying concentrations used.
- Patients receiving 20% HAS experienced a more negative mean daily fluid balance compared to those receiving 4% HAS only.
- Exposure to 20% HAS was not independently associated with increased 90-day mortality or prolonged RRT dependence.
Conclusions:
- Albumin administration in varying concentrations is common in RENAL trial patients.
- While 20% HAS was associated with a more negative fluid balance, it did not independently increase mortality or RRT dependence compared to 4% HAS.
- These findings suggest that 20% HAS can be used in RRT patients without a significant increase in adverse outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:38Induction of Nephrotic Syndrome in Mice by Retrobulbar Injection of Doxorubicin and Prevention of Volume Retention by Sustained Release Aprotinin
Published on: May 6, 2018
08:44Continuous IV Infusion is the Choice Treatment Route for Arginine-vasopressin Receptor Blocker Conivaptan in Mice to Study Stroke-evoked Brain Edema
Published on: September 1, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications