Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A comprehensive psychometrics of cognitive ability measures: Reliability, practice effects, and the stability of latent factor structures across retesting.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

Quiet eyes: Visual gaze stability predicts intra- and interindividual differences in attention control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

Individual differences in attention and learning: A latent variable analysis.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025

Same author

Memory selectivity in younger and older adults: The role of conative factors in value-directed remembering.

Psychology and aging·2025

Same author

Individual differences in the dynamics of attention control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Same author

Mind-wandering when studying valuable information: The roles of age, dispositional traits, and contextual factors.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.

Nash Unsworth¹, Matthew K Robison¹, Ashley L Miller¹

¹Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|September 13, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Working memory capacity (WMC) influences antisaccade task performance by affecting goal management and attention consistency. Higher WMC individuals better prepare for trials, though attention lapses and processing speed also play roles.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Working memory capacity (WMC) is crucial for cognitive control.
The antisaccade task measures the ability to suppress a prepotent reflexive eye movement and execute a volitional one.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and performance on the antisaccade task.
To identify specific cognitive mechanisms underlying this relationship, including goal management, attention consistency, and processing speed.

Main Methods:

Eight experiments involving 2,003 participants assessed WMC and antisaccade performance.
Methods included examining individual differences in goal management during task preparation, analyzing attention lapses, and manipulating stimulus onset asynchrony.
Structural equation modeling was used to determine the contribution of various factors to the WMC-antisaccade relationship.

Main Results:

WMC interacted with delay intervals, suggesting high WMC individuals better activated task goals.
Individual differences in attention consistency (lapses) and processing speed partially mediated the relationship between WMC and antisaccade performance.
WMC still accounted for unique variance in antisaccade performance, independent of these mediating factors.

Conclusions:

The relationship between WMC and antisaccade performance is complex and multifactorial.
Goal activation, attention consistency, and processing speed are key contributors to this relationship.
WMC plays a distinct role in antisaccade task success beyond these mediating factors.