Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Vaccine injury compensation: the Israeli case.
Shelly Kamin-Friedman1,2, Nadav Davidovitch3
1Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel. shellykf@skflaw.co.il.
Israel's Vaccine Injury Compensation Law aimed to simplify claims and boost vaccine confidence, but failed to meet these goals. Revisions are needed to ensure fairness, solidarity, and public trust in vaccination programs.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Policy
- Legal Studies
- Medical Law
Background:
- Israel enacted the Vaccine Injury Compensation Law in 1989, offering compensation without requiring proof of negligence.
- In 2021, COVID-19 vaccines were included under this law, covering vaccinations from December 20, 2020, to December 21, 2022.
- The study examines the law's original objectives and barriers to their fulfillment, particularly relevant given discussions on manufacturer liability exemptions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the objectives of Israel's Vaccine Injury Compensation Law upon its enactment.
- To explore the barriers hindering the fulfillment of these objectives.
- To assess the law's relevance in the context of COVID-19 vaccine liability discussions.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative methodology.
- Content analysis of relevant legal documents.
- In-depth interviews.
Main Results:
- Legislators intended to lower the burden of proof and streamline claims for vaccine recipients.
- The law aimed to encourage high vaccination compliance by assuring compensation for injuries.
- Implementation analysis revealed that these goals were not achieved.
Conclusions:
- The law's implementation has not upheld public health principles of fairness and solidarity.
- Adversarial proceedings and certain provisions may erode public trust and undermine vaccine compliance.
- Recommendations include accepting circumstantial evidence, administrative deliberation, and public case disclosure to enhance fairness, solidarity, and trust.
More Related Videos
09:03Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
08:04Development of an IFN-γ ELISpot Assay to Assess Varicella-Zoster Virus-specific Cell-mediated Immunity Following Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
Published on: July 9, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Dosage Compensation
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with distinct numbers of X chromosomes will...
Immunological Memory
What is Immunological Memory?
Immunological memory is an integral function of the immune system that allows it to recognize and react more rapidly and effectively to pathogens previously encountered. This feature...
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...