Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.3K
Contribution of rationality to vaccine attitudes: Testing two hypotheses
Helena Tomljenovic1, Andreja Bubic2, Nikola Erceg3
1School of Medicine University of Split Split Croatia.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
|September 14, 2021
Summary
Rationality influences vaccine attitudes, especially when parents distrust authorities. Resisting cognitive biases like omission bias can improve vaccine acceptance, supporting the bounded rationality hypothesis.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Vaccine hesitancy is linked to cognitive biases.
- The role of rationality in vaccine attitudes requires further clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of rationality on parental vaccine attitudes.
- To examine the influence of disillusionment toward authorities and rational thinking abilities.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional correlational study with 823 participants.
- Online survey assessing vaccine attitudes, disillusionment, cognitive reflection, and heuristics and biases.
- Vaccination vignette used to assess omission bias.
Main Results:
- Disillusionment toward authorities predicted all vaccine attitude components (affective, behavioral, cognitive).
- Heuristics and biases tasks predicted affective and cognitive attitudes, but not behavioral.
- Rationality moderated the effect of omission bias on vaccine attitudes, particularly for highly disillusioned parents.
Conclusions:
- Higher rationality, specifically resisting omission bias, can mitigate negative vaccine attitudes stemming from disillusionment.
- Findings support the bounded rationality hypothesis regarding vaccine decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Reason and Intuition
7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
381
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
381
Social Proof
29.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.5K
Vaccinations
46.6K
Overview
46.6K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
10.6K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.6K

