Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Adjusting for Variation in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Is Needed to Improve Care After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Leif I Solberg1, Ella Chrenka, Steve E Asche
1From the HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN (Solberg, Chrenka, Asche, and Ziegenfuss), the Park Nicollet Health Services, St Louis Park Specialty Center, St Louis Park, MN (Johnson and Cunningham), and the Park Nicollet Health Services, TRIA Orthopedics, Bloomington, MN (Horst, Reams, and Swiontkowski).
Introduction:
Limited quantitative information exists about the patient and surgeon factors driving variation in patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores, limiting the use of these data in understanding and improving quality. The overall goal of this study was to learn how to adjust PROM scores to enable both individual and group quality improvement.
Methods:
Observational study in which preoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS)-10 measures were prospectively obtained through patient survey from 1,173 of 1,435 possible patients before total knee arthroplasty and from 810 of the 1,173 patients at 12 months postoperatively (response rates = 81.7% and 69.0%). Regression analyses identified the relative contribution of patient and surgeon risk factors to OKS change from baseline to 12 months. Variation in patient scores and surgeon performance was described and quantified. Adjusted outcomes were used to calculate an observed and expected score for each surgeon.
Results:
(1) Moderate variation was observed in pre-/post-OKS change among the surgeons (n = 16, mean change = 15.5 ± 2.2, range = 12.1-21.1). Forty-five percent of the variance in OKS change was explained by the factors included in our model. (2) Patient preoperative OKS and PROMIS physical score, race, and BMI were markedly associated with change in OKS, but other patient factors, surgeon volume, and years of experience were not. (3) Eight surgeons had observed scores greater than expected after adjustment, providing an opportunity to learn what strategies were associated with better outcomes.
Discussion:
Traditional age/sex adjustment of patient mix would have had no effect on mean PROM scores by surgeon. An adjustment model that includes the factors found to be markedly associated with outcomes will allow care systems to identify individual surgeon care management strategies potentially important for improving patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

