Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Implementing Patch Clamp and Live Fluorescence Microscopy to Monitor Functional Properties of Freshly Isolated PKD Epithelium
Published on: September 1, 2015
A comparison of immediate release and delayed release cysteamine in 17 patients with nephropathic cystinosis
Christina van Stein1, Sabrina Klank2, Marianne Grüneberg2
1Department of General Pediatrics, Metabolic Diseases, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. c_vans01@uni-muenster.de.
Background:
Nephropathic cystinosis is a rare and severe metabolic disease leading to an accumulation of cystine in lysosomes which especially harms kidney function. A lifelong therapy with the aminothiol cysteamine can delay the development of end-stage renal disease and the necessity of kidney transplantation. The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of immediate-release and delayed-release cysteamine on cystine and cysteamine levels as well as assessing the onset of adverse effects.
Methods:
We retrospectively analysed cystine and cysteamine levels of 17 patients after a single dose of immediate-release cysteamine (Cystagon®, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Canonsburg, PA and Recordati Pharma GmbH) as well as a single dose of delayed-release cysteamine (Procysbi®; Horizon Pharma USA and Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) respectively. Data were collected during a period of three years in the context of optimizing the individual treatment regimens. The dose of DR-cysteamine was reduced to 70% of the equivalent dose of IR-cysteamine. The efficacy of both formulas in depleting white blood cells' cystine levels and their side effects were compared.
Results:
Immediate (IR)- and delayed-release (DR) cysteamine effectively decreased intracellular cystine levels under the target value of 0.5 nmol cystine/mg protein, while fewer side effects occurred under DR-cysteamine. Mean maximum levels of cysteamine were reached after 60 min with IR-cysteamine and after 180 min with DR-cysteamine.
Conclusion:
A therapy with DR-cysteamine is as effective as IR-cysteamine while less side effects were reported. Our data show that DR-cysteamine should be dosed higher than 70% of the equivalent dose of IR-cysteamine in order to decrease cystine levels over an extended period of time. Moreover, our data suggest increasing the dosing scheme of Procysbi® to three times daily, to prevent a rapid decrease and achieve a steadier decline in cystine levels. Due to the more convenient dosing scheme, DR-cysteamine might ameliorate therapy adherence and improve patients' quality of life.
More Related Videos
06:14Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Published on: October 15, 2017
08:55Nasal Potential Difference to Quantify Trans-epithelial Ion Transport in Mice
Published on: July 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion