Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

204
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
204
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

551
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
551
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

651
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
651

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma (EMC) of the Breast.

Clinical breast cancer·2025
Same author

Impact of Obesity on Breast Cancer Clinicopathological Characteristics in Underserved US Community Safety-Net Hospital: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Clinical breast cancer·2024
Same author

Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A SEER Database Study, 2000-2020.

Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia·2024
Same author

Catheter ablation versus medical therapy in atrial fibrillation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2024
Same author

Striving toward safe abortion services in Nepal: A review of barriers and facilitators.

Health science reports·2024
Same author

A case report of lung metastasis in a cervical cancer presenting as a consolidation.

Radiology case reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Utilizing the Most Accurate Preoperative Risk Calculator.

Wasey Ali Yadullahi Mir1, Francesco Fiumara2, Dhan B Shrestha1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, USA.

Cureus
|September 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews preoperative risk calculators like the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Revised Cardiac Risk Index to determine their effectiveness in predicting surgical complications.

Keywords:
myocardial infarctionpostoperative complicationsquality improvementsurgeonsvenous thromboembolism

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

442
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

442
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Science
  • Surgical Outcomes Research
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Preoperative risk assessment is crucial for predicting surgical complications.
  • Common tools include the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI).
  • These tools aim to forecast risks such as mortality, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, stroke, and venous thromboembolism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review existing literature on the utility of preoperative risk calculators.
  • To compare the predictive accuracy of different risk assessment tools across various surgical procedures.
  • To provide recommendations on the most suitable risk calculator for specific types of surgeries.

Main Methods:

  • Literature search of published studies comparing predicted to actual postoperative complications.
  • Retrospective data compilation from patients undergoing similar surgical procedures.
  • Analysis of the accuracy and utility of ACS-NSQIP and RCRI in predicting adverse events.

Main Results:

  • The review synthesizes findings from multiple studies evaluating the performance of ACS-NSQIP and RCRI.
  • Identified variations in the predictive accuracy of these tools depending on the surgical context.
  • Highlighted the need for context-specific evaluation of risk calculator performance.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of preoperative risk calculators varies by surgical type.
  • Further research is needed to refine and validate these tools for diverse surgical populations.
  • Recommendations will be made regarding optimal risk assessment strategies for different surgical interventions.