Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

17.1K

Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience and Patient Satisfaction.

Rishi Suresh1,2, Andres F Doval1, Emily Newstrom1

  • 1Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Tex.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|September 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laryngeal Cryotherapy for Neurogenic Cough: Safety, Feasibility, and Prospective Outcomes.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

Novel use of Rolled Temporalis Fascia Graft for Radix and Dorsum Elevation in Open Rhinoplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

The Impact of Etiology on Time to Vocal Fold Motion Recovery in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

The Laryngoscope·2026
Same author

The Natural History of Vocal Fold Motion Recovery in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Postoperative Fluoroscopic Appearance After Flexible Endoscopic Zenker's Diverticulotomy.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same author

Weight Gain in Obese Children After Intracapsular Tonsillectomy.

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology·2025

Revision rhinoplasty patients often have unique anatomical issues and are more likely to be dissatisfied with their surgical outcomes. Patient satisfaction surveys are crucial for understanding results beyond the surgeon's perspective.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Facial Plastic Surgery

Background:

  • Limited data exists on common characteristics of patients seeking primary versus revision rhinoplasty.
  • Traditional success metrics focus on surgeon outcomes, neglecting patient perspectives.
  • Patient satisfaction is a critical, yet often overlooked, aspect of rhinoplasty success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and compare anatomical and functional traits in primary and revision rhinoplasty patients.
  • To evaluate patient satisfaction using a dedicated survey.
  • To investigate the impact of graft choice (auricular vs. rib cartilage) on revision rhinoplasty outcomes and satisfaction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 102 rhinoplasties (June 2016-January 2020).

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

638

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

17.1K
Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery
04:14

Author Spotlight: Recent Advancements in Reoperative Foregut Surgery

Published on: September 22, 2023

638
  • Analysis of preoperative anatomical/functional characteristics and surgical interventions.
  • Patient satisfaction assessment via a survey (60% response rate) with graft type comparison for revision cases.

    • Main Results:

    • Primary rhinoplasty patients more frequently presented with large noses or humps.
    • Revision rhinoplasty patients commonly exhibited middle vault collapse.
    • Revision rhinoplasty patients reported a higher incidence of dissatisfaction with their outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Certain characteristics in revision rhinoplasty patients may stem from the initial surgery.
    • Surgeons must be vigilant to avoid creating new or worsening deformities during primary rhinoplasty.
    • Patient-reported outcomes highlight a greater dissatisfaction rate among revision rhinoplasty patients.