Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Comparable Glucose Control with Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart Using a Second-Generation Hybrid
Dale Morrison1, Dessi P Zaharieva2, Melissa H Lee1,3
1Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Fast-acting insulin aspart (FiAsp) and standard insulin aspart showed no difference in glucose control during and after exercise using a closed-loop system. Future insulin formulations need greater offset for improved exercise glucose management in type 1 diabetes.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management requires careful glucose monitoring, especially during physical activity.
- Exercise, both moderate-intensity (MIE) and high-intensity (HIE), significantly impacts glycemic control in individuals with T1D.
- Closed-loop (CL) insulin delivery systems aim to automate glucose regulation, but exercise poses a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of fast-acting insulin aspart (FiAsp) versus standard insulin aspart in maintaining glucose control during and after MIE and HIE within a second-generation CL system.
- To evaluate the time in range (TIR) and time spent in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia following different exercise protocols with two insulin formulations.
Main Methods:
- A randomized crossover study involving 16 adults with T1D.
- Participants used a MiniMed™ Advanced hybrid CL system with either FiAsp or insulin aspart for 6-week periods.
- Four exercise sessions (MIE and HIE) were performed in random order within each period, with glucose monitored continuously.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in 24-hour TIR, time in hypoglycemia, or time in hyperglycemia were observed between FiAsp and insulin aspart for both MIE and HIE.
- TIR approached 100% within 2 hours post-exercise and overnight across all conditions.
- The study found no improvement in CL glucose control with FiAsp compared to standard insulin aspart during or after exercise.
Conclusions:
- Current insulin formulations, including FiAsp, do not offer a significant advantage over standard insulin aspart for glucose control with exercise in a second-generation CL system.
- Development of insulin formulations with a greater offset in action is necessary to enhance CL system performance during physical activity in T1D.
- Further research is needed to optimize insulin delivery strategies for exercise in automated insulin delivery systems.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Glucose Homeostasis: Regulation of Blood Glucose
During fasting, when blood glucose levels are low, the pancreas secretes glucagon. it...

