Use quantitative parameters in spectral computed tomography for the differential diagnosis of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer patients
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025
Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020
Suidan Huang1, Hongjia Meng1, Renli Cen1
1Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Background:
Accurate diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node (LN) metastases is very important for the treatment and prognosis in lung cancer patients. Spectral computed tomography (CT), as a non-invasive approach, has good prospects for detecting mediastinal nodal metastasis. However, the diagnostic criteria of differentiating metastatic and nonmetastatic LNs have not been determined.
Methods:
Clinical and imaging data of 64 lung cancer patients (mean age 61.3±10.3 years, 41 men) from April to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The unenhanced scan and contrast enhanced arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) spectral CT scans were performed. The 70 keV monochromatic image and iodine-based image in all phases were analyzed to measure the parameters of LNs. LNs were divided into the metastatic and non-metastatic groups based on confirmative pathological results, and their differences were statistically analyzed. The receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the differential diagnosis.
Results:
Seventy-four metastatic LNs and 152 non-metastatic LNs were obtained. Compared with non-metastatic LNs, metastatic LNs often had a larger size (P<0.001). In the unenhanced scans, the density of metastatic LNs was lower than that of non-metastatic LNs (P<0.001); however, there was no difference in CT value in AP and VP between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs (P=0.07, P=0.08, respectively). A statistically significant difference was found in iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC) and slope of the spectral curve (λHU) in unenhanced scan, IC and λHU in AP, as well as IC, NIC and λHU in VP between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs. There was no difference in NIC in AP between them.
Conclusions:
Combined with morphology, spectral CT quantitative parameters demonstrate certain diagnostic efficiency for differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs in lung cancer patients.
