Improving Disaster Data Systems to Inform Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience Building in Australia: A Comparison
Joseph Cuthbertson1, Frank Archer1, Andy Robertson2
1Monash University Disaster Resilience Initiative, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objective:
Disaster impact databases are important resources for informing research, policy, and decision making. Therefore, understanding the underpinning methodology of data collection used by the databases, how they differ, and quality indicators of the data recorded is essential in ensuring that their use as reference points is valid.
Methods:
The Australian Disaster Resilience Knowledge Hub (AIDRKH) is an open-source platform supported by government to inform disaster management practice. A comparative descriptive review of the Disaster Mapper (hosted at AIDRKH) and the international Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT) was undertaken to identify differences in how Australian disasters are captured and measured.
Results:
The results show substantial variation in identification and classification of disasters across hazard impacts and hazard types and a lack of data structure for the systematic reporting of contextual and impact variables.
Conclusions:
These differences may have implications for reporting, academic analysis, and thus knowledge management informing disaster prevention and response policy or plans. Consistency in reporting methods based on international classification standards is recommended to improve the validity and usefulness of this Australian database.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Introduction to GIS


