Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Author Spotlight: Therapeutic Benefit of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation in Depression Treatment
Published on: July 7, 2023
Heterogeneity in major depression and its melancholic and atypical specifiers: a secondary analysis of STAR*D
Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces1, John F Buss2, Eiko I Fried3
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47405, IN, USA. lolorenz@iu.edu.
Objectives:
The melancholic and atypical specifiers for a major depressive episode (MDE) are supposed to reduce heterogeneity in symptom presentation by requiring additional, specific features. Fried et al. (2020) recently showed that the melancholic specifier may increase the potential heterogeneity in presenting symptoms. In a large sample of outpatients with depression, our objective was to explore whether the melancholic and atypical specifiers reduced observed heterogeneity in symptoms.
Methods:
We used baseline data from the Inventory of Depression Symptoms (IDS), which was available for 3,717 patients, from the Sequenced Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. A subsample met criteria for MDE on the IDS ("IDS-MDE"; N =2,496). For patients with IDS-MDE, we differentiated between those with melancholic, non-melancholic, non-melancholic, atypical, and non-atypical depression. We quantified the observed heterogeneity between groups by counting the number of unique symptom combinations pertaining to their given diagnostic group (e.g., counting the melancholic symptoms for melancholic and non-melancholic groups), as well as the profiles of DSM-MDE symptoms (i.e., ignoring the specifier symptoms).
Results:
When considering the specifier and depressive symptoms, there was more observed heterogeneity within the melancholic and atypical subgroups than in the IDS-MDE sample (i.e., ignoring the specifier subgroups). The differences in number of profiles between the melancholic and non-melancholic groups were not statistically significant, irrespective of whether focusing on the specifier symptoms or only the DSM-MDE symptoms. The differences between the atypical and non-atypical subgroups were smaller than what would be expected by chance. We found no evidence that the specifier groups reduce heterogeneity, as can be quantified by unique symptom profiles. Most symptom profiles, even in the specifier subgroups, had five or fewer individuals.
Conclusion:
We found no evidence that the atypical and melancholic specifiers create more symptomatically homogeneous groups. Indeed, the melancholic and atypical specifiers introduce heterogeneity by adding symptoms to the DSM diagnosis of MDE.
Insights
The melancholic and atypical specifiers for major depressive episode (MDE) do not reduce symptom heterogeneity. These specifiers may actually increase symptom diversity in depression diagnoses.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Mental Health Research
Background:
- Major Depressive Episode (MDE) specifiers aim to reduce diagnostic heterogeneity.
- Previous research suggests the melancholic specifier might increase symptom variability.
- The impact of melancholic and atypical specifiers on symptom homogeneity in MDE requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether melancholic and atypical specifiers reduce symptom heterogeneity in Major Depressive Episode (MDE).
- To analyze symptom profiles within melancholic, atypical, and general MDE groups.
- To quantify observed heterogeneity using unique symptom combinations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized baseline data from 3,717 patients in the Sequenced Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial.
- Analyzed a subsample meeting MDE criteria (N=2,496) using the Inventory of Depression Symptoms (IDS).
- Differentiated patients into melancholic, atypical, and non-specifier groups, quantifying symptom profile heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Observed heterogeneity was greater within melancholic and atypical subgroups compared to the general MDE sample.
- No statistically significant differences in symptom profiles were found between melancholic and non-melancholic groups.
- Differences between atypical and non-atypical groups were smaller than expected by chance, indicating no reduction in heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
- Melancholic and atypical specifiers do not create more symptomatically homogeneous groups.
- These specifiers may introduce additional heterogeneity to the MDE diagnosis.
- Current evidence does not support the use of these specifiers for reducing symptom presentation variability.
Related Concept Videos
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Depressive Disorders: MDD and Dysthymia
Depression: Overview
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Long-term Depression
Calcium Ion Concentration Mechanism
If over...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

