Latency phase in mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review in animal models

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the need for the latency period in distraction osteogenesis to obtain adequate bone formation. Searches were performed in the Web of Science, Pubmed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane electronic databases. Nine articles were selected for qualitative analysis. Quality assessment was performed using the 10-item SYRCLE tool. Clinical stability was evaluated in two articles, histology was analysed in seven, histomorphometry was analysed in three, and mechanical testing was used in two. The results favoured the five-day latency group in two studies and the seven-day latency group in one. No differences were found between latency and no-latency groups in six studies. A latency period greater than seven days did not provide any additional benefit. Important risks of bias were found in all articles. Some of the results were influenced by uncontrolled intervening factors, such as consolidation time. The need for a latency period for distraction osteogenesis in animal models is not yet clear. Caution must be exercised when extrapolating the results of animal protocols to applications with humans in the clinical setting.