Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

In Vitro Enzyme Measurement to Test Pharmacological Chaperone Responsiveness in Fabry and Pompe Disease
Published on: December 20, 2017
Enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase for mucopolysaccharidosis type VI
Marcela Junqueira Brunelli1, Álvaro N Atallah2, Edina Mk da Silva3
1Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI) or Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome is a rare genetic disorder caused by the deficiency of arylsulphatase B. The resultant accumulation of dermatan sulphate causes lysosomal damage. The clinical symptoms are related to skeletal dysplasia (i.e. short stature and degenerative joint disease). Other manifestations include cardiac disease, impaired pulmonary function, ophthalmological complications, hepatosplenomegaly, sinusitis, otitis, hearing loss and sleep apnea. Intellectual impairment is generally absent. Clinical manifestation is typically by two or three years of age; however, slowly progressive cases may not present until adulthood. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with galsulfase is considered a new approach for treating MPS VI.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treating MPS VI by ERT with galsulfase compared to other interventions, placebo or no intervention.
Search Methods:
Eletronic searches were performed on the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register. Date of the latest search: 09 June 2021. Further searches of the following databases were also performed: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, the Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of the latest search: 20 August 2021.
Selection Criteria:
Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical studies of ERT with galsulfase compared to other interventions or placebo.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data and assessed the certainty of the the evidence using the GRADE criteria.
Main Results:
One study was included involving 39 participants who received either ERT with galsulfase (recombinant human arylsulphatase B) or placebo. This small study was considered overall to have an unclear risk of bias in relation to the design and implementation of the study, since the authors did not report how both the allocation generation and concealment were performed. Given the very low certainty of the evidence, we are uncertain whether at 24 weeks there was a difference between groups in relation to the 12-minute walk test, mean difference (MD) of 92.00 meters (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.00 to 172.00), or the three-minute stair climb, MD 5.70 (95% CI -0.10 to 11.50). In relation to respiratory tests, we are uncertain whether galsulfase makes any difference as compared to placebo in forced vital capacity in litres (FVC (L) (absolute change in baseline), given the very low certainty of the evidence. Cardiac function was not reported in the included study. We found that galsulfase, as compared to placebo, may decrease urinary glycosaminoglycan levels at 24 weeks, MD -227.00 (95% CI -264.00 to -190.00) (low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether there are differences between the galsulfase and placebo groups in relation to adverse events (very low-certainty evidence). In general, the dose of galsulfase was well tolerated and there were no differences between groups. These events include drug-related adverse events, serious and severe adverse events, those during infusion, drug-related adverse events during infusion, and deaths. More infusion-related reactions were observed in the galsulfase group and were managed with interruption or slowing of infusion rate or administration of antihistamines or corticosteroids drugs. No deaths occurred during the study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review are based only on one small study (a 24-week randomised phase of the study and prior to the open-label extension). We are uncertain whether galsulfase is more effective than placebo, for treating people with MPS VI, in relation to the 12-minute walk test or the three-minute stair climb, as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low. We found that galsulfase may reduce urinary glycosaminoglycans levels. We are also uncertain whether there are any differences between treatment groups in relation to cardiac or pulmonary functions, liver or spleen volume, overnight apnea-hypopnea, height and weight, quality of life and adverse effects. Further studies are needed to obtain more information on the long-term effectiveness and safety of ERT with galsulfase.
Insights
Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with galsulfase may reduce urinary glycosaminoglycans in Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI). However, evidence is limited, and its effectiveness for physical function and safety remains uncertain, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI), or Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome, is a rare genetic disorder.
- It results from a deficiency in arylsulphatase B, leading to dermatan sulfate accumulation and lysosomal damage.
- Clinical manifestations include skeletal dysplasia, cardiac issues, impaired pulmonary function, and other complications, typically presenting in early childhood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with galsulfase for MPS VI.
- To compare galsulfase treatment against other interventions, placebo, or no intervention.
Main Methods:
- Conducted electronic searches across multiple databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, and clinical trial registries.
- Included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing ERT with galsulfase to other interventions or placebo.
- Two authors independently screened studies, assessed bias, extracted data, and evaluated evidence certainty using GRADE criteria.
Main Results:
- One small study with 39 participants was included, comparing galsulfase ERT to placebo.
- Evidence certainty was very low, leading to uncertainty about galsulfase's effect on the 12-minute walk test and 3-minute stair climb.
- Galsulfase may decrease urinary glycosaminoglycan levels (low-certainty evidence), but its impact on respiratory function, cardiac function, and adverse events remains uncertain.
Conclusions:
- The review is based on a single small study with an unclear risk of bias.
- Uncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of galsulfase for physical function in MPS VI patients.
- Further research is required to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of galsulfase ERT for MPS VI.
Related Concept Videos
Glycosaminoglycans
GAGS are found in the extracellular matrix of vertebrates, invertebrates, and bacteria. Due to their polar nature they attract water, and serve as excellent lubricants or shock absorbers in an animal body.
Hyaluronic...
Lysosomal Hydrolases
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic...
Oligosaccharide Assembly
Multiple sugar molecules that may or may...
Phase II Reactions: Sulfation and Conjugation with α-Amino Acids
Drug Metabolism: Phase II Reactions

