Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

79.4K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
79.4K
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

5.9K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
5.9K
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

7.2K
Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a  complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...
7.2K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

10.9K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
10.9K
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins02:36

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

9.9K
Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...
9.9K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

6.8K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multimodal feature fusion for molecular property classification.

Journal of cheminformaticsĀ·2026
Same author

Accurate identification of cytochrome P450 proteins using multimodal integration of protein language models.

International journal of biological macromoleculesĀ·2026
Same author

Danthron as a novel IL-6R agonist promotes thrombopoiesis via the SRC/RAS/MAPK pathway.

Frontiers in immunologyĀ·2026
Same author

Epigallocatechin promotes megakaryocyte differentiation via ERα-dependent SRC/PI3K/AKT signaling for thrombocytopenia treatment.

Journal of ethnopharmacologyĀ·2026
Same author

Development of a machine learning-based nomogram for predicting atherosclerosis risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Clinical and experimental rheumatologyĀ·2026
Same author

Prediction of cyclin-dependent proteins using pre-trained protein language models and effective neural network architectures.

Analytical biochemistryĀ·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

8.9K

Evaluation of deep learning approaches for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity.

Yonglin Zhang1, Qi Mo1, Li Xue2

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Genomics
|September 17, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study compares deep learning models for predicting transcription factor (TF) binding sites. A hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) + Deep Neural Network (DNN) model demonstrated superior performance in TF binding affinity prediction.

Keywords:
Binding specificityConvolutional neural networkDeep learningDeep neural networkTranscription factor

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

993
Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
09:58

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

Published on: June 27, 2020

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

8.9K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

993
Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
09:58

Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis

Published on: June 27, 2020

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Transcription factors (TFs) are crucial regulators of gene expression.
  • Accurate identification of TF binding sites and prediction of binding affinities are essential for understanding gene regulation.
  • Deep learning (DL) models show promise for predicting DNA-TF binding, but architectural comparisons are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare the performance of different deep learning architectures for predicting TF binding specificity.
  • To identify the most effective DL architecture for analyzing SELEX-seq and HT-SELEX data.

Main Methods:

  • Applied four distinct deep learning architectures to SELEX-seq and HT-SELEX datasets.
  • Utilized data from three species and 35 TF families.
  • Evaluated model performance using 10-fold cross-validation.

Main Results:

  • The hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) + Deep Neural Network (DNN) architecture achieved the highest performance.
  • Demonstrated the relative strengths of different DL models in predicting TF binding specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The hybrid CNN + DNN model is highly effective for predicting TF binding specificity.
  • This study provides a benchmark for DL model selection in TF binding prediction.
  • Findings are applicable to future modeling efforts with increasing high-throughput TF binding data.