Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

186
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
186
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

62.2K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
62.2K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

63.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
63.5K
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion01:17

Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion

1.3K
Richard Lazarus' cognitive mediational theory highlights the pivotal role of cognitive appraisal in shaping emotional responses. According to this theory, the evaluation of a stimulus — based on personal values, goals, beliefs, and expectations — mediates the emotional response. This appraisal process is immediate and often occurs unconsciously, influencing the intensity and nature of the resulting emotion.
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
1.3K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

139
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
139

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-empirical physics from a historical perspective: New pathways in history and philosophy of physics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

When "replicability" is more than just "reliability": The Hubble constant controversy.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2024
Same author

Epistemic Justification and Methodological Luck in Inflationary Cosmology.

The British journal for the philosophy of science·2019
Same author

Nephrotoxicity from contrast media: attenuation with theophylline.

Radiology·1995

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K

Meta-empirical support for eliminative reasoning.

C D McCoy1

  • 1Underwood International College, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|September 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Eliminative reasoning, a key scientific method, can justify theories by broadening the concept of evidence. This approach moves beyond purely heuristic or pragmatic justifications for scientific conclusions.

Keywords:
Eliminative reasoningMeta-empirical evidenceNon-empirical confirmationTheory assessment

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Methodology
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Eliminative reasoning is a historical scientific method.
  • It is proposed as a justification for scientific theories.
  • Existing arguments rely on a narrow view of evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how a broader conception of evidence justifies eliminative reasoning.
  • To illuminate the methodological significance of eliminative reasoning.
  • To explore its application in various scientific contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of evidence.
  • Examination of historical scientific episodes.
  • Argumentation for a broader evidential conception.

Main Results:

  • A broader conception of evidence provides robust justification for eliminative reasoning.
  • Eliminative reasoning's methodological significance is clarified.
  • The approach is applicable across diverse scientific contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Broadening the conception of evidence strengthens the justification for eliminative reasoning.
  • This expanded view enhances understanding of scientific methodology.
  • Eliminative reasoning plays a crucial, justifiable role in scientific progress.