Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer corner #15. The AAOS: request for computer system proposal.

R M Letts

    Orthopaedic Review
    |November 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Paraspinal Muscle Activity During Sports.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Cervical spondylolysis in children: is it posttraumatic?

    Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2000
    Same author

    Semitendinosus tenodesis for repair of recurrent dislocation of the patella in children.

    Journal of pediatric orthopedics·1999
    Same author

    Musculoskeletal manifestations of the Antley-Bixler syndrome.

    Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B·1999
    Same author

    Infantile hemangiopericytoma of the musculoskeletal system: case report and literature review.

    Journal of pediatric orthopedics·1998
    Same author

    Anterior cruciate ligament tears in children: an analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment.

    Journal of pediatric orthopedics·1997
    Same journal

    Simple intraoperative traction system for acetabular fracture surgery.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    Same journal

    A 37-year-old man with left foot pain. Symptomatic accessory navicular synchondrosis.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    Same journal

    The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to prevent ischemic neural damage during preoperative embolization of a vascular renal metastasis.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    Same journal

    Comparison of axial T1 spin-echo and T1 fat-saturation magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the diagnosis of chondromalacia patellae.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    Same journal

    Scoliosis in Rett syndrome.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    Same journal

    On recycling in the operating room.

    Orthopaedic review·1994
    See all related articles

    This guide offers a computer package to improve vendor-orthopaedic office relationships by clarifying system needs and functions. It recommends evaluating vendor proposals and visiting offices using the system to prevent common computer issues.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Informatics
    • Medical Practice Management
    • Orthopaedic Surgery

    Background:

    • Effective communication and clear understanding between vendors and orthopaedic surgeons are crucial for successful practice management.
    • Computer system implementation in orthopaedic offices often faces challenges due to miscommunication and improper needs assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a structured approach for selecting and implementing computer systems in orthopaedic practices.
    • To reduce communication barriers and enhance the relationship between vendors and orthopaedic offices.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing a computer package with questionnaires to define office needs and vendor responsibilities.
    • Recommending the invitation of three vendor proposals for comprehensive evaluation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Suggesting a site visit to observe systems in use for 6-12 months.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed format significantly reduces communication and understanding issues between vendors and orthopaedic surgeons.
    • Addresses both vendor system functionality and orthopaedic office requirements through detailed questionnaires.
    • Minimizes computer problems stemming from the improper evaluation of necessary system functions.

    Conclusions:

    • The computer package and recommended evaluation process are vital for successful orthopaedic office computer system implementation.
    • Thorough needs assessment and vendor evaluation, including on-site visits, are essential for a positive vendor-orthopaedic office relationship.
    • Adopting this structured approach leads to improved practice management and operational efficiency.