The timing of targeted therapy initiation in metastatic sarcoma as an adjuvant to first-line chemotherapy or a...

58 cases of metastatic sarcoma were reviewed retrospectively in order to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent (n=24, group A) versus sequential (n=34, group B) use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in metastatic sarcoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) 1 was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to disease progression or recurrence. PFS' was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the failure of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the date of last follow-up or death. The results revealed that patients in group A possessed a higher tumor burden compared to those in group B (P=0.049). Survival curves revealed that the median PFS1 (15.2 vs. 5.4 months, P=0.000), median PFS' (15.2 vs. 10.8 months, P=0.049), and median OS (42.3 vs. 25.3 months, P=0.041) of subjects in group A were remarkably longer than those of group B. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in group A experienced more favorable PFS1 (15.2 vs. 3 months, P=0.000), PFS' (15.2 vs. 5.8 months, P=0.003), and OS (35.2 vs. 15.7 months, P=0.011) than those in group B, with findings especially prominent in patients with tumor burden ≥ 10 cm in comparison to patients with tumor burden < 10 cm (P ≥ 0.05). All grades of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and oral mucositis were more frequently diagnosed in patients of group A compared to those of group B. However, there were no significant differences between the rates of Grade 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. This investigation suggests that the concurrent use of targeted therapy and chemotherapy may be useful and safe as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic sarcoma who possess a high tumor burden.