Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Impact of Precision Medicine on Clinical Outcomes: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study
Ryann Quinn1, Rajvi Patel1, Cristina Sison2,3
1Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.
Purpose:
The strategy of precision medicine has been widely adopted in the practice of oncology, although the efficacy remains unclear. This study assesses clinical outcomes in patients with an actionable alteration found during FoundationOne CDx™ (F1CDx) testing and who received a targeted therapy based on the results.
Materials And Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with tumors that underwent F1CDx from September 2012 to July 2018. F1CDx provided actionable alterations for patients to select appropriate therapies. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate (ORR) at 3 months from the start of study treatment. The secondary objectives were to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results:
One thousand patients underwent F1CDx testing. Six hundred fifty-two patients were identified as having actionable mutations. Thirty-eight patients (18 males and 20 females) received targeted therapy and were included in the study. The most common alterations were PD-1/PDL-1, high-TMB, P13K, and HER2/ERBB2. Patients received various treatments including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, trastuzumab, and everolimus. Eight (23.5%) and six (17.7%) patients achieved partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), respectively; 20 (58.8%) had progression of disease (PD). The disease control rate was 41.2% (95% CI: 24.7% to 59.3%). The median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.3 to 5.4 months), and median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.5 to 33.7 months).
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrate promising data in precision medicine in real community oncology practice. It warrants further large and prospective studies in patients with actionable alterations.
Insights
Precision medicine shows promise in oncology, with targeted therapies improving outcomes for patients with actionable genetic alterations. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger, prospective studies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Precision medicine is increasingly used in oncology, but its real-world effectiveness requires further evaluation.
- FoundationOne CDx™ (F1CDx) testing identifies actionable genomic alterations to guide targeted therapy selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess clinical outcomes in cancer patients receiving targeted therapy based on F1CDx results.
- To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 1000 patients undergoing F1CDx testing between September 2012 and July 2018.
- Identified 652 patients with actionable mutations; 38 patients received targeted therapy and were included in the analysis.
- Primary endpoint: ORR at 3 months. Secondary endpoints: PFS and OS.
Main Results:
- The most common alterations included PD-1/PDL-1, high-TMB, P13K, and HER2/ERBB2.
- Among 38 patients, 23.5% achieved partial response (PR) and 17.7% had stable disease (SD), resulting in a 41.2% disease control rate.
- Median PFS was 2.7 months and median OS was 9.9 months.
Conclusions:
- Real-world data suggest potential benefits of precision medicine and targeted therapies in oncology.
- Further large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to validate these promising findings in patients with actionable genomic alterations.
More Related Videos
07:03Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
Published on: December 1, 2023
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Regression Toward the Mean
Cancer Survival Analysis